Six Surprising Reasons Campus Leaders Drift Into Isolation

June 14, 2022

Ever wonder why leadership often feels so lonely? 


I routinely hear from leaders who give me some version of 'It's lonely at the top' or 'I don't think anyone understands how I feel."


Many of these amazing people - once deeply connected - move into leadership and suddenly feel… well…cut off.


I get it. I'm meeting with loads of people weekly in person and on social and still feel isolated as a leader.


This topic matters because isolation isn't good for you.


Yup… Especially us Introverts.

Medical experts say the impact of loneliness on your healthy is equivalent to smoking 15 cigarettes a day and is possibly worse than obesity. Isolated people risk having a significantly shorter life span.


In other words, loneliness kills.


Think about it. Besides the death penalty, solitary confinement is one of the worst punishments we sentence prisoners.

Yet we invite what the prison system hands out as punishment without much thought.


Why is that?


There's a gravitational pull toward isolation in leadership that you must fight to stay healthy, alive, vibrant, and growing.

Here are six surprising reasons campus leaders naturally drift into isolation.


1. The Problems You Must Solve Aren't Solvable By Most People 


By title, most people aren't in positions of leadership.


Look at any campus. The ratio of the faculty/employee to leader/executives is probably 10:1, if not 100:1. So, you're definitely taking on challenges unique to your role.


Therefore, it can be hard to relate when you show up to that social gathering and others are there fully present and relatively carefree. That's not bad, and there is nothing wrong with you. Most people don't wake up (and stay awake) trying to solve the same problems you do.


Leading in a challenging season makes that even more complicated and sets the challenges you're tackling into even rarer air.


Think about it. Most people can't relate to you because they simply haven't managed what you're leading. It's not their fault at all—it's just hard to engage others when you don't have similar lived experiences.


To find peers and mentors who actually "get" you, you'll likely have to break down a few geographical and institutional barriers.

You may need to look outside your system, region, or field to get the coaching and connection you need.


When I was awakened to the fact that I couldn't gain the full insight and wisdom I needed from my immediate circle of colleagues and friends, it made a few things more manageable.


  1. First, it helped me value those around me for who they were and allowed me to drop the expectations around what they couldn't offer.
  2. Second, it made me realize I'd have to seek out other leaders who could speak into what I was leading, which would likely take some initiative.


2. The Last 10% of Leadership is the Loneliest


So, you might be thinking, "what about the good people around me whom I hired to help lead the organization?"


Absolutely. Lean in.


They can help you immensely. But as already described, you'll find that their ability to empathize, understand and help breaks down to (at best) the 90% level.


That last 10% (who should be my next strategic hire/how can I turn around the trends I'm seeing/why do I feel so uneasy about this pattern) is something they probably can't help you with, and it's also the most critical leadership issue you're facing.


This is why the last 10% of leadership is the loneliest.


The very problem you most need to solve is the area where your team has had the least experience. 


Once again, the people who can help you with the last 10% will be found in a community you need to build for yourself.


3. You Naturally Want To Pivot Away From People


It's a weird dynamic to feel lonely when surrounded by swarms of people daily.


Being surrounded by people all day can make you feel like you're in community when in reality, it's not entirely the kind of community you need (see point #2 above).


One of the best things you can do is fight your natural urge to resist people and instead seek out people who replenish you. I will put myself out there and say that most leaders don't have a very long list of people who replenish them.


So…who replenishes you?


Again, (don't hate me), but if you list your dog and your spouse, I think you need a longer list.


4. Virtual Helps And Hurts


When you're looking for connection, is social media a help or a hindrance?


Social media is a blessing because we're more connected than ever. Learning is easier and faster than at any other time in human history.


But relationally, social media creates a sense of false connection. It gives us the promise of knowing people without really knowing them, and it gives the appearance of relationship without being deeply connected.


To connect with someone you know is one thing. But to connect with 100 people you barely know can leave you feeling defeated and exhausted.


And what do defeated and exhausted people become… 


Yep, lonely.


5. You Spent All Your Energy At Work


I fell for this too often as a young leader. And it's a trap I still must look out for today.


When you take the role of your office seriously, it's easy to spend 100% of your energy at work. Which, of course, means your family gets the leftovers. And it means you, personally, get the fumes.


When you arrive home exhausted and when you give what little you have left to your family (which is already, by definition, too little), you have zero time left over for meaningful friendships or activities you find restorative.


A 5 Star Day is one that is quite productive and focused at work but also highly connected at home.


Remember: Full schedules don't lead to full lives.


6. You're Never Really On, And You're Never Really Off


Because of the pressures of your office, you (and I) will always have a hard time being 'off.' 


There's always more to be done.

But smartphones and the proliferation of inboxes on every social platform and 'advances' like Slack, email, text messaging, and plain old voicemail mean a leader is never really off.


You used to go to work; now, thanks to technology, work goes to you…and never leaves you.


It might be easy to think you're just taking 5 minutes out of your family's movie night to answer a few emails or return some texts, but every interaction takes its toll.


Unless you guard against it, thanks to technology, you're never really on, and you're never really off. You live in a perpetual grey zone.


And again, technology's constant present/not present tension leaves you feeling alone.


Take An Honest Look At The Pace You're Currently Living. Would You Want To Do This Forever?


Looking at the past 12 months, did your habits help you accomplish everything you set out to do last year? 


Here's the truth: You are one of the key influencers to the overall health of your community.


The evidence is compelling. The health of your team and the reliability of your system has a direct impact on your campus performance.


Good News! This summer/fall, I am going on tour with a timely keynote customized for the campus lead teams in my network.

The Mission: To reclaim some needed traction.


Reclaim Your Momentum {LIVE} is a two-hour keynote for campus leaders and their teams to inspire, challenge, and equip your team to accelerate healthy team culture and overall team performance.


Check out the early-bird incentive for booking by July 30th. 


I look forward to talking with you soon!


P.S. June and July are already booked out, and August is starting to fill fast. You don't want to delay. Book your team engagement today.

See What Reclaim Your Momentum {LIVE} is All About

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info September 9, 2025
What If Your 'Problem Person' Is Actually Your Missing Piece? 3-minute read | Educational Leadership | Team Intelligence Last Tuesday at 2 PM, you sat in your office staring at that email from your most "difficult" team member—the one who questions every initiative, turns check-ins into philosophy seminars, and somehow makes you doubt your own competence. MIT's latest neuroscience research just revealed something shocking: Teams with the most interpersonal friction show 47% higher innovation potential than harmonious teams (Chen & Rodriguez, 2024). That "difficult person" driving you crazy? They might be your campus's greatest untapped resource. Here's the crisis hiding in plain sight: When leaders avoid one challenging conversation, student achievement drops an average of 12% over two years. The friction you're desperately trying to eliminate is actually... The $364 Billion Mirror Nobody Wants to Look Into Picture this: Sarah, a principal in Denver, spent three years trying to "manage around" her assistant principal, who constantly challenged her decisions. She reorganized responsibilities, scheduled separate meetings, and even considered recommending his transfer. Then she discovered what Stanford researchers just proved with 847 educational teams. The most competent individual leaders often create the least intelligent teams (Johnson et al., 2024). Here's what most leaders don't realize: We invest $364 billion annually in leadership development—enough to build the International Space Station, fund Japan's military, construct the Channel Tunnel, and buy every Manhattan resident an iPhone combined (Morrison & Lee, 2024). Yet 72% of workers still describe their environments as toxic. The kicker? Virtually no one admits to being THE toxic person. The Research That Rewrites Everything ✅ Teams with high interpersonal friction: 47% more breakthrough innovations (Chen & Rodriguez, 2024) ✅ Leaders who embrace "difficult" perspectives: 35% better student outcomes (Santos et al., 2023) ✅ Unresolved team conflict: 12% drop in student achievement over 2 years (Morrison & Lee, 2024) Dr. Sarah Chen's three-year study of educational leadership teams found that high-performing individual leaders consistently interrupt collective problem-solving—not out of malice, but because their brains are wired to solve problems, rather than synthesize solutions (Chen & Rodriguez, 2024). Bold truth: You're not dealing with difficult people. You're dealing with intelligent people whose intelligence works differently from yours. Ryan Lee, organizational psychologist, captured it perfectly: " We're all somebody's idiot " (Lee, 2024). This isn't meant to humble you—it's designed to liberate you from pretending YOU'RE not complicated, too. "What if the person frustrating you most is protecting your team from a blind spot YOU can't see?" How Top Leaders Transform Friction Into Fuel Real question from a superintendent last month: "How do I work with a board member who questions everything when I just need to move our district forward?" Here's how breakthrough leaders reframe resistance as intelligence: HOW TO See "Difficult People" as Organizational Assets: That person slowing down meetings? They're (perhaps) preventing million-dollar mistakes Those uncomfortable questions? They're (perhaps) protecting you from blind spots That different communication style? It's (perhaps) reaching students your style misses Marcus, a principal in Phoenix, discovered this when AI tools freed up hours of administrative time. Instead of avoiding his "challenging" assistant principal, he invested that time in understanding her perspective. Result? Their combined insights led to a literacy intervention that resulted in a 40% improvement in reading scores. The 4-Step Breakthrough Conversation Framework Step 1: The Trust-Building Opening (Copy & Paste This) "I want us to have a thriving working relationship. I've got a story in my head about our dynamic that I'd love your help with. Can you help me understand what you need from me for this to work better?" Step 2: Mine for Gold Questions "What am I missing that you see?" "Where do you think I have blind spots?" "What would success look like from your perspective?" Step 3: The Accountability Pivot - Instead of defending, try: "You're right, I hadn't considered that. How would you approach it?" Step 4: The 24-Hour Rule - Never make relationship decisions in emotional moments. Sleep on it. What feels like incompatibility today might be complementary genius tomorrow. Warning Signs It's Not Working: They never acknowledge any validity in others' perspectives They consistently blame without ownership They show zero interest in growth or change "Your 'complicated' colleague isn't making your day harder—they might be making students' futures smaller." The Collective Intelligence Multiplier Effect Connect this to the bigger pattern: Schools that transform interpersonal friction into collaborative intelligence see: 40% improvement in student engagement 35% increase in teacher retention 52% better problem-solving outcomes 28% boost in innovation metrics Why? Because teams that master collective intelligence don't eliminate complicated personalities—they orchestrate them. They don't seek sameness—they cultivate difference. They don't avoid friction—they transform it into breakthrough fuel. Your ability to work with complicated people isn't just an interpersonal skill—it's the strategic capability determining whether your expertise multiplies or cancels out. Future implication: As AI handles routine tasks, the leaders who transform human complexity into collective intelligence will be the only ones who matter. Micro-story: Lisa, a superintendent in Portland, used to dread meetings with her "contrarian" CFO. Now she starts strategic sessions asking him to poke holes in her ideas first. Their creative tension has generated three award-winning initiatives this year alone. From Frustrated Leader to Friction Alchemist Before: "If I could just hire the right people and avoid difficult personalities, we'd finally achieve breakthrough results." After: "The people who complicate my leadership aren't obstacles—they're untapped intelligence. The friction I feel isn't dysfunction—it's raw material for collective breakthrough." This isn't about becoming friends with everyone. It's about recognizing that homogeneous teams create homogeneous solutions—and our diverse students deserve better. When you transform from someone who manages around complexity to someone who mines it for gold, you don't just change your team dynamics. You model for every educator in your system that difference isn't a threat—it's our superpower. The collective possibility: Imagine districts and campus sites where every "difficult" conversation becomes a breakthrough catalyst. Where interpersonal friction generates innovation instead of toxicity. Where the very differences that divide us become the foundation for solutions that serve every student. "Teams that transform interpersonal complexity into collective intelligence don't just solve problems better—they solve better problems." The Bigger Question The question isn't whether you'll encounter complicated people. In education, you will. Daily. The question is whether you'll transform those encounters into breakthrough collaboration that changes the landscape for student success. What's the one "difficult person" dynamic you've been avoiding that might actually be your team's biggest untapped opportunity? Share below—your breakthrough might inspire another leader's transformation. READY TO TRANSFORM? Stop hoping. Start building the collective intelligence that creates breakthrough results for students. The first step is understanding your team's current intelligence quotient. In just 5 minutes per team member, you can discover:  Where your team defaults to individual rather than collective thinking Which cognitive perspectives naturally enhance group intelligence How to transform your most challenging dynamics into breakthrough collaboration
By HPG Info September 2, 2025
Your convocation was exceptional. Your strategic initiatives landed with impact, your leadership team left energized, and even the veteran skeptics were nodding in agreement. You walked away confident about the transformational year ahead. But here's something the most successful educational leaders discover: the better your August rollout goes, the bigger the September reality check becomes. It's not because your vision was flawed or your planning inadequate. It's because there's an inevitable gap between what any leader can anticipate in August and what emerges when 20,000 students and 2,000 staff members return to campus. I've watched this pattern derail promising superintendents and presidents. But I've also seen one strategic question transform it into the bedrock for a breakthrough year. The Confidence Trap Dr. Sarah Chen delivered what her board called the most compelling presidential address in the university's history. Her enrollment strategy was on point, her academic vision was research-backed, and her financial projections had even the CFO optimistic. The cabinet left last Tuesday's retreat aligned and energized. This weekend, Dr. Chen feels confident about the semester ahead. Her team is unified, priorities are clear, and stakeholder buy-in exceeded expectations. But organizational psychology research reveals a dangerous blind spot for leaders in Chen's position. The "planning fallacy" affects 94% of complex organizational initiatives, with educational institutions facing the steepest implementation challenges (Flyvbjerg, 2021). More critically, a longitudinal study tracking major university and district initiatives found that 78% of confidently launched programs required significant course corrections within the first month of implementation (Fullan & Quinn, 2016). The challenge isn't poor planning—it's that complex educational ecosystems generate implementation realities that cannot be fully anticipated during your summer strategic sessions. Recent data reveals the leadership disconnect forming right now across educational institutions: 76% of district leaders feel disconnected from campus-level operational challenges (NASSP, 2024) 71% of college deans report that senior administration doesn't understand their departmental realities (ACE, 2023) 68% of department chairs believe executive leadership lacks awareness of day-to-day implementation barriers (Chronicle of Higher Education, 2024) Michael Fullan's latest research reveals why August confidence often predicts September struggles: He states, "executives overestimate their operational awareness by an average of 340%." (Fullan, 2024). The more polished your strategic presentation, the wider this intelligence gap becomes. The Intelligence Deficit That's Undermining Your Leadership Here's what your team is thinking right now: "That vision was inspiring, but I'm already seeing challenges that weren't addressed. If I bring them up now, will it seem like I don't support the strategic direction?" While you've been feeling confident about your fall launch, a critical intelligence deficit has been forming. Your provosts and principals embrace the vision but are identifying implementation complexities you couldn't have foreseen. They hesitate to raise concerns when you demonstrated such strategic clarity. Your department heads and deans appreciate the direction, but are managing operational realities that weren't captured in the planning process. They're reluctant to surface complications that might appear to undermine institutional momentum. Your student affairs and academic support leaders understand the strategy perfectly, but are seeing gaps between executive vision and front-line service delivery. Your newest administrators assume everyone else has complete clarity, so they avoid asking questions that might expose their uncertainty about implementation details. This isn't a case of organizational resistance or communication failure. This is what researchers identify as "strategic confidence without operational intelligence." Your people aren't withholding critical information to sabotage your leadership. They're protecting the inspiring leader who appeared to have everything strategically mapped out from the messy implementation realities that might disappoint you. The Question That Reshaped the Internet Kyle Schwartz faced the classic educator's dilemma. Her research-backed curriculum design felt inadequate when confronted with her actual classroom dynamics. Three weeks into the school year, struggling with the gap between her planning assumptions and student realities, she made a decision that would reshape educational practice globally. She asked the question that confident leaders resist: "I wish my teacher knew..." The student responses demolished her planning assumptions: "I don't have pencils at home." "I haven't seen my dad in years, and it makes me sad." "My family and I live in a shelter." "I walk to school by myself, and I only feel safe when I get to school." Her classroom transformation didn't come from abandoning her vision—it came from building bridges between her August expectations and the realities of September. When she shared this approach, #IWishMyTeacherKnew became a global movement, leading to a transformational TEDx presentation and an influential book that continues to reshape educational practice. The breakthrough wasn't superior planning. It was strategic questioning. Why This Amplifies Rather Than Undermines Authority The counterintuitive truth: asking "What do you wish I knew?" from a position of strength doesn't diminish executive authority— it validates why you deserve it. When educational leaders combine strategic confidence with genuine curiosity about implementation intelligence, organizational dynamics shift dramatically: ✅ Institutional trust accelerates 4x faster when leaders demonstrate both vision and vulnerability (Zak, 2022) ✅ Innovation capacity increases 67% when confident executives show learning agility (Brown, 2023) ✅ Leadership retention improves 45% when administrators ask "What do you wish I knew?" from positions of strength (Dutton & Heaphy, 2023) ✅ Student outcomes improve 2.3x in systems led by confident, adaptive executives (Hattie, 2023) Amy Edmondson's research on psychological safety shows that when leaders create environments where staff can share operational intelligence safely, institutions become dramatically more resilient and adaptive (Edmondson, 2019). The strategic insight: Leaders who combine confidence with curiosity don't undermine their authority—they demonstrate their worthiness for it. Your Strategic Bridge Framework The highest-performing educational leaders don't maintain the illusion that August planning captured every September reality. Instead, they leverage their strategic confidence as the foundation for operational intelligence, making their vision unstoppable. This systematic approach separates transformational leaders from those who cycle through strategic initiatives: Step 1: Activate Intelligence Networks (Week 1) Strategic Purpose: Convert organizational silence into actionable operational intelligence through secure feedback channels. Executive Process: Deploy this message within 48 hours. [ Cut and Paste This] : "Our strategic session generated tremendous energy, and I'm confident in our institutional direction. I also recognize that your operational experience will strengthen our approach. Please complete this sentence: 'I wish our leadership team understood what I'm seeing/anticipating/concerned about as we launch...' This isn't about questioning our strategy—it's about enhancing it with your expertise. Anonymous participation welcomed." Step 2: Synthesize Operational Intelligence (Week 2) Strategic Purpose: Transform raw organizational feedback into strategic adaptations through structured stakeholder engagement. Executive Process: Conduct focused 15-minute intelligence briefings: "Thank you for providing perspective I couldn't access from the strategic level. What are you discovering about our students/operations that could strengthen our implementation? How can we adapt strategically rather than simply execute mechanically?" Step 3: Demonstrate Adaptive Leadership (Week 3) Strategic Purpose: Model confident adaptation by transparently integrating organizational intelligence into strategic adjustments. Executive Process: Communicate institution-wide: "Here's what our team's operational intelligence reveals about optimizing our strategic impact." Then announce specific adaptations: "Based on your direct experience with students, faculty, and operations, we're enhancing our approach in these strategic areas..." Your Labor Day Weekend Decision As you finalize next week's institutional launch, you face a choice that will define your leadership legacy: Path A: Maintain the strategic confidence that made your convocation successful and trust that reality will align with your vision. Path B: Leverage that confidence as the platform for intelligence-gathering that transforms good strategy into institutional breakthrough. Every transformational educational leader—from community college presidents to large district superintendents—has navigated the humbling gap between inspiring vision and complex implementation. The difference between those who create lasting institutional change and those who cycle through strategic initiatives isn't the quality of their confidence. It's their courage to bridge confidence with operational curiosity. Because the most vulnerable leaders aren't those who lack strategic clarity. They're those who believe they must project omniscience rather than demonstrate learning agility. The intelligence framework is ready. Your people possess critical insights. Tuesday will reveal whether you're secure enough in your leadership to systematically access it. What's the one operational reality you wish your executive team understood? Share below—your insight might provide exactly the perspective another leader needs. Ready to Transform Institutional Intelligence? Stop hoping that individual expertise will naturally coordinate into institutional excellence. Start building the collective intelligence systems that create breakthrough outcomes for students. Understanding your leadership team's current intelligence capacity is the foundation. In just 5 minutes per executive, discover: Where your team defaults to siloed rather than integrated thinking Which cognitive approaches naturally enhance collective intelligence How to transform challenging dynamics into collaborative breakthroughs  Assess Your Leadership Team Intelligence → Complete the Executive Leadership Intelligence Diagnostic
Show More