Higher Performance Insights | THE FIELD GUIDE TO BUILDING AN AVERAGE LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

April 23, 2025
higher performance insights

Nine Standard Practices To Get You Started


FOREWORD: THE LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT REALITY


Let's face it: leadership development is a staple in every educational institution. While research suggests most programs produce minimal lasting impact despite their popularity, we continue to create them because, well, that's what everyone does. Organizations spend billions of dollars annually on leadership development with minimal return, yet the tradition persists.


Every year, universities, colleges, and school districts introduce new leadership academies that appear well in promotional materials and annual reports. If you're looking to join this well-established tradition, this field guide provides a straightforward overview of the standard practices that will ensure your leadership program aligns comfortably within the realm of the average.


THE AVERAGE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY EXPERIENCE: 9 STANDARD PRACTICES


1. Individual Skills Focus


Most leadership programs naturally focus on individual skill-building rather than addressing systems or context. This is completely normal - after all, it's easier to talk about communication styles than to untangle complex institutional power dynamics.


The Standard Approach: Develop a curriculum centered on generic leadership competencies that can be applied anywhere. Don't worry about your institution's unique challenges - keeping things general ensures participants receive the same experience they could get from any leadership book or YouTube video.


2. Presentations Over Practice

While research suggests that most leadership development occurs through experience, the standard approach is to schedule numerous presentations and lectures. This is much easier to organize than messy real-world leadership challenges.


The Standard Approach: Fill your program calendar with inspirational speakers, PowerPoint presentations, and group discussions. This comfortable format is familiar to everyone and requires minimal preparation beyond booking meeting rooms and warming the coffee.


3. Simple Satisfaction Surveys (Quick and Easy)

Like most leadership programs, you'll want to distribute feedback forms at the end of each session. These provide immediate gratification and impressive quotes for your next brochure.


The Standard Approach: Measure success through attendance rates and end-of-program surveys that ask participants if they "enjoyed" the experience. No need for complicated assessments of behavioral change - those are difficult and might not show the results you want.


4. Convenient Participant Selection

Most programs select participants based on who is available, who has been waiting the longest, or who has the most seniority. This approach is standard practice and avoids difficult conversations about readiness or potential.


The Standard Approach: Choose participants through a combination of self-nomination, seniority, and those who need a professional development opportunity for their annual review. This approach requires minimal effort and ensures a smooth workflow.


5. Event-Based Programming

Despite evidence that leadership development is ongoing, most programs are designed as finite experiences with clear start and end dates. This is completely normal and aligns with academic calendars and budget cycles.


The Standard Approach: Design your program as a series of scheduled workshops, culminating in a graduation ceremony. Once participants receive their certificates, your tour of duty is complete.


6. Comprehensive Content Coverage

Typical leadership programs pride themselves on covering every timely leadership topic.


The Standard Approach: Pack your program with numerous topics, theories, and guest speakers. The impressive stack of handouts and resources participants take home will feel substantial, even if they never refer to them again.


7. Universal Leadership Principles

Most leadership programs rely on generic content that can be applied anywhere. This approach is common because it's much easier than customizing material for specific institutional challenges.


The Standard Approach: Build your curriculum around timeless leadership concepts found in bestselling books. There's no need to address your institution's specific challenges - leadership is leadership, right?


8. Minimal Executive Involvement

Leadership programs often operate with limited participation from senior leaders, typically relying on ceremonial appearances. This is normal - executives have many demands on their time.


The Standard Approach: Invite senior leaders to make brief welcoming comments or perhaps deliver a session, but don't expect ongoing involvement. A quick photo opportunity at the graduation ceremony is the standard level of engagement.


9. Aspirational Standards

It's perfectly normal to teach leadership approaches that don't align with how things actually work at your institution. Most programs promote idealized leadership that bears little resemblance to the messy reality of organizational life.


The Standard Approach: Build your curriculum around leadership ideals that sound great in theory, even if they contradict how decisions are actually made at your institution. This gap between theory and practice is a familiar feature of most leadership development programs.


THE ALTERNATIVE: BETTER PRACTICES OF LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT


If you're actually interested in creating a leadership development initiative that delivers lasting impact, research suggests focusing on:


  1. Systems-Based Approaches that address organizational context alongside individual skills (Galli & Müller-Stewens, 2012)
  2. Experience-Driven Learning centered on real challenges rather than abstract concepts (McCall, 2010)
  3. Ongoing Development with coaching and application opportunities (Petrie, 2014)
  4. Meaningful Assessment that measures behavioral change and organizational impact (Avolio et al., 2010)
  5. Senior Leader Involvement that models and reinforces desired leadership behaviors (Gurdjian et al., 2014)


A FINAL WORD: REAL LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT IS POSSIBLE


We understand the challenges you face. Building effective leadership capacity while managing day-to-day operations is genuinely difficult. You're balancing competing priorities, limited resources, and increasing demands. Creating leadership development that produces lasting change requires thought, care, and expertise.


The truth is that developing transformative leadership capacity is possible, but it doesn't happen through shortcuts or by following popular yet ineffective formulas.


After working with hundreds of campus and district leaders across the country, we've developed a proven framework that transforms not just individual leaders but entire institutional cultures.


JOIN THE LEADERSHIP & CULTURE {INSTITUTE}


Develop the foundation and framework necessary to Become, Build, Lead, and MULTIPLY modern campus leadership development that works to scale and sustain across your entire organization.


The Difference: Your people become YOUR GUIDES.


Our 12-Month Leadership Experience includes:

  • 1:1 Discovery and Natural Leadership Profile sessions for each leader
  • Monthly world-class workshops (on-site or virtual)
  • Comprehensive digital resource library
  • Executive performance coaching
  • Lead Team 360™ assessment


Teams consistently achieve:

  • Enhanced communication and trust
  • Better team collaboration
  • Stronger organizational alignment
  • Restored team capacity
  • Improved decision-making
  • Reduced operational friction
  • Intended results


Don't settle for leadership development that merely checks a box when you can build genuine leadership capacity that transforms your institution.


Ready to elevate your team's performance?

Visit https://www.higherperformancegroup.com/lci to learn more about the LEADERSHIP & CULTURE {INSTITUTE}.


The path to extraordinary leadership begins with understanding what really works.


REFERENCES



Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Quisenberry, D. (2010). Estimating return on leadership development investment. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(4), 633-644.

Beer, M., Finnström, M., & Schrader, D. (2016). Why leadership training fails—and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review, 94(10), 50-57.

Conger, J. A., & Benjamin, B. (1999). Building leaders: How successful companies develop the next generation. Jossey-Bass.

Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581-613.

Day, D. V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R. E., & McKee, R. A. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 63-82.

DeRue, D. S., & Myers, C. G. (2014). Leadership development: A review and agenda for future research. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 832-855). Oxford University Press.

Galli, E. B., & Müller-Stewens, G. (2012). How to build social capital with leadership development: Lessons from an explorative case study of a multibusiness firm. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 176-201.

Gurdjian, P., Halbeisen, T., & Lane, K. (2014). Why leadership-development programs fail. McKinsey Quarterly, 1(1), 121-126.

Hess, E. D., & Ludwig, K. (2017). Humility is the new smart: Rethinking human excellence in the smart machine age. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Wiley.

McCall, M. W. (2010). Recasting leadership development. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(1), 3-19.

Petrie, N. (2014). Future trends in leadership development. Center for Creative Leadership.


Help Spread the Word

If you found value in this post, we’d love your help spreading the word! Please consider sharing this on your favorite social media platform and tag Higher Performance Group and Dr. Joe Hill. Your support helps us reach and inspire more awesome people like you!

Like What You've Read?


Get practical, research-based ideas to Accelerate Higher Team Performance delivered straight to your inbox every Tuesday.

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info June 11, 2025
How to Thread the Needle Between Progress and Funky Politics The longest bridge in the world spans 102 miles across the Danyang-Kunshan Grand Bridge in China. It wasn't built with one heroic leap—it was constructed one careful span at a time, each section tested and proven before the next began. As you sit in budget meetings with federal funding cuts looming and compliance investigations multiplying, that bridge isn't just an engineering marvel—it's your strategic blueprint for survival. Because in education today, yesterday's mainstream initiative can become tomorrow's federal investigation faster than you can say "equity audit." The Ground Is Moving Beneath Your Feet The new federal leadership has eliminated DEI initiatives, frozen federal grants, and directed the closure of the Department of Education. What was considered "acceptable" innovation six months ago may now be regarded as "radical." What seemed impossible is suddenly policy. Political scientist Joseph Overton identified how cultural acceptance shifts through what became known as the "Overton window"—the range of policies voters find acceptable at any given time. The Michigan-based Mackinac Center, where Overton worked, theorized that this window typically shifts gradually. However, we're witnessing something unprecedented: rapid, dramatic movements that compress decades of change into months. The current moment illustrates how quickly political boundaries can shift, transforming yesterday's fringe ideas into today's mainstream policies. Your strategic challenge isn't just adaptation—it's anticipation. Welcome to Educational VUCA Reality You're no longer managing regular strategic planning. You're navigating VUCA conditions—Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity—originally developed by the U.S. Army War College to describe post-Cold War strategic environments. Volatility: Federal funding freezes, Title IX reversals, and transgender sports bans hitting simultaneously across all educational levels. Uncertainty: Will Title I funding survive? Pell Grants dropping from $7,400 to $5,700? University endowments over $1 billion facing civil compliance investigations? Complexity: Special education funding shifting to block grants while maintaining "current levels," NIH grants paused, research costs capped at 15%. Ambiguity: Expand school choice while closing federal oversight. Promote "evidence-based" reading while eliminating professional development grants. Mixed messages aren't confusion—they're the new operating environment. Your Strategic Fill-in-the-Blank Framework Like Mad Libs, strategic prompts help you think creatively within structured boundaries. When political landscapes shift rapidly, ready frameworks keep you responsive rather than reactive (Senge & Edmondson, 2024): For K-12 Leaders: "What if we strengthened ______________ using only state and local resources before Title II funding disappears?" "How might we demonstrate student achievement gains without triggering federal investigations into our _______________ initiatives?" For Higher Ed Leaders: "What would happen if we reframed our diversity programming as ______________ student success initiatives?" "How do we maintain research momentum when ______________ federal funding streams face uncertainty?" These aren't prescriptions—they're thinking tools for navigating the "gotcha" landscape while maintaining your mission. The Professional Creative's New Reality Your job isn't to resist the tide, though values matter deeply. It's to be strategically creative—pushing just enough beyond the current window to serve students without triggering systems actively hunting for "radical" programs. The federal landscape reshapes rapidly, but your influence remains local. That's where your power lies—and increasingly, that power depends on your team's collective intelligence (Woolley et al., 2023). Navigating the Next 90 Days These are shifting landscapes with no clear roadmap. What follows aren't recommendations, but different lenses through which thoughtful leaders are viewing their challenges: What Some K-12 Leaders Are Exploring: Language emphasizing measurable outcomes—framing student support as academic acceleration Documentation highlighting concrete results rather than theoretical frameworks Strengthening local partnerships before federal resources become uncertain What Some Higher Ed Leaders Are Considering: Revenue diversification as traditional funding faces constraints Reexamining how student services are described and delivered Proactive compliance reviews, especially for institutions with significant endowments What Many Find Helpful: Building initiatives defensible through multiple political lenses—student achievement, family strengthening, and economic development. The key isn't perfect answers, but flexibility to adapt as circumstances evolve. This isn't about abandoning principles or playing politics. It's about finding sustainable ways to serve your mission when the ground keeps shifting. Your Strategic Courage Moment Leaders who successfully navigate these waters discover that careful, thoughtful approaches create space for others to find their own path forward. The opportunity lies not in perfect safety or bold risks, but in persistent creativity that builds bridges while the landscape around you changes. In environments like this, transformation comes less from brilliant strategy than from steady courage-the kind that spreads when others see it's possible to move forward thoughtfully, even in uncertainty. Research consistently demonstrates that team performance, not individual brilliance, determines institutional success in navigating turbulent waters (Deloitte, 2023). Your Next Steps: Audit your language. How would your current initiatives sound if described through achievement, family, or economic development lenses? Diversify your support. What local partnerships could replace federal dependencies? Document strategically. How do you measure impact in ways that translate across political perspectives? Build bridges, not monuments. Every program should be defensible as supporting student success—language that travels well in any political climate. The longest bridge in the world exists because engineers built it one tested span at a time. Your educational mission deserves the same careful and persistent attention. Your students need you to be strategically courageous—not reckless, not paralyzed, but thoughtfully bold enough to keep building bridges while the ground shifts beneath your feet. Because transformation doesn't require genius in this environment. It requires strategic courage—and the wisdom to know that sometimes the most radical act is building something that lasts. Unlock Your Team's Full Potential The cost of waiting is too high. Every day your team operates at less than full potential represents lost opportunities for your students and institution. Research indicates that most campus leadership teams operate at only 60% of their full potential (Higher Performance Group, 2024). Take the {TQ}|Team Intelligence Assessment In just five minutes per team member, discover actionable insights that have been demonstrated to improve team performance by an average of 27% within six months. The TQ Assessment reveals how your team can leverage cognitive diversity to transform from talented individuals into a truly intelligent collective. Your Next Steps: Assess Your Team's Intelligence : Take the comprehensive TQ assessment and receive your personalized team analysis within 48 hours Discover Your Path Forward : Schedule your complimentary TQ report review with a certified consultant Blueprint Your Success : Develop your practical 90-day plan to upgrade your team's performance 
By HPG Info June 4, 2025
Getting Your Value Proposition Right Matters More Than Getting Your Funnel Right The Problem? Your SEM and CRM Are Working Perfectly As enrollment declines accelerate and student engagement plummets, here's a hard truth: Our schools aren't failing — our values are. We're optimizing for yesterday's priorities while today's learners walk away hungry for something many are not even measuring. THE GREAT MISDIRECTION While we obsess over test scores and college readiness, Bain & Company groundbreaking research on the Elements of Value reveals why students, families, and communities are losing faith in our institutions. We're delivering functional value — but starving them of the emotional, life-changing, and social impact they desperately need. The numbers tell the story: 40% of high school students report chronic disengagement, college mental health crises have reached epidemic levels, and parents increasingly question whether education is worth the investment. Meanwhile, we continue to optimize metrics that don't measure what matters most. THE FOUR-LEVEL VALUE CRISIS Functional Level: We're Actually Decent Here - Schools save time (with organized schedules), provide information, reduce costs (compared to private tutoring), and offer a variety of courses. This is our comfort zone---and our trap. Emotional Level: We're Failing Spectacularly- When did schools stop being places that reduce anxiety and start being anxiety factories? Where's the fun, the therapeutic value, the wellness focus? Students (and staff) leave our institutions more stressed, not less. We've forgotten that learning should feel rewarding, not punishing. Life-Changing Level: We've Lost Our Way- Education should provide hope and enable self-actualization. Instead, we've created systems that crush dreams rather than cultivate them. How many students graduate feeling motivated about their future versus those who are relieved they survived? Social Impact Level: Our Biggest Miss - Schools should develop citizens who contribute to something larger than themselves. Instead, we're producing individuals who feel disconnected from their purpose and sense of community belonging. THE HIDDEN COST OF VALUE POVERTY Consider Sarah, a high school senior who recently told me: "I can pass any test you give me, but I have no idea who I am or what matters to me." Her school delivered functional value perfectly, and failed her completely. This isn't about lowering academic standards. It's about recognizing that when students feel emotionally depleted, disconnected from their purpose, and starved of a sense of belonging, even the most effective test prep becomes meaningless. Research shows that students experiencing higher-level value elements demonstrate: 67% better long-term retention 45% higher post-graduation satisfaction 78% stronger alumni engagement 52% better mental health outcomes THREE STRATEGIES TO RECLAIM VALUE Strategy 1: Design for Emotional Wellness First - Stop treating student mental health as an add-on service. Build therapeutic value into daily experiences: Start each class by connecting learning to students’ hopes and interests Create "anxiety reduction zones" where failure becomes learning fuel Design experiences that feel rewarding, not just rigorous Measure joy alongside achievement Strategy 2: Embed Life-Changing Moments - Every semester, students should experience at least three "this changes everything" moments: Connect learning to personal identity and purpose Create opportunities for genuine self-discovery Provide hope through mentorship and future visioning Enable students to see their unique potential actualized Strategy 3: Cultivate Social Impact Daily- Transform education from individual competition to collective contribution: Embed community service into academic learning Create opportunities for students to solve real community problems Build belonging through collaborative purpose Help students see their education as preparation for meaningful citizenship YOUR VALUE AUDIT CHALLENGE This Week: Survey 10 random students: "What value does school provide beyond academics?" Identify your school's emotional value gaps List three ways learning could feel more rewarding This Month: Redesign one program to include life-changing elements Create student wellness metrics that matter Pilot one community impact project per classroom This Year: Develop a comprehensive value proposition that addresses all four levels Train staff to recognize and deliver emotional and social value Measure student hope, belonging, and purpose alongside test scores POSSITIVE GOSSIP: THOSE GETTING IT RIGHT Higher Ed Spotlight: Arizona State University's "Be a Devil" Initiative - ASU transformed student experience by embedding social impact into every major. Their "solving world problems" approach delivers all four value levels simultaneously. Students report 89% satisfaction with purpose-driven learning, and employers actively recruit ASU graduates for their community-minded approach. The result? Record enrollment growth while peer institutions struggle. Learn more about ASU K-12 Spotlight: New Tech Network Schools - These project-based learning schools redesigned education around real community problems. Students at New Tech High in Napa don't just study environmental science---they solve actual water quality issues for local vineyards. The therapeutic value of meaningful work is evident in the following statistics: a 94% graduation rate, 87% college enrollment, and students who describe school as "the best part of my day." Their secret? Every project delivers hope, a sense of belonging, and self-actualization alongside academic rigor. Learn more about New Tech Network Both institutions demonstrate that when schools deliver comprehensive value, everything changes — engagement, outcomes, and community reputation. THE VALUE REVOLUTION MUST START NOW The schools thriving in 2025 aren't just academically excellent — they're emotionally nourishing, life-changing, and socially impactful. They understand that families don't choose schools solely based on test scores; instead, they choose based on the total value delivered. Your students aren't asking for less rigor — they're asking for more meaning. They don't want easier classes — they want classes that make them feel more alive, more hopeful, and more connected to something bigger than themselves. The Elements of Value framework isn't just business theory — it's a roadmap for educational transformation. When we deliver value at all four levels, we not only improve outcomes but also restore faith in education itself. Your value revolution starts with one simple question: If your students could get knowledge (and a degree) anywhere, why should they choose to learn with you? The answer isn't in your curriculum catalog — it's in how you make them feel about themselves, their future, and their place in the world. Ready to Lead This Discussion With Your Team? If you found value in this topic and would like an easy, prepared way to lead this discussion with your leadership team, we have included a leader guide in our weekly blog covering this same topic. Join our email group and receive timely topics like this with the added bonus of a downloadable team discussion guide. Go to https://www.higherperformancegroup.com/blog to sign up today! Our TQ | Team Intelligence Assessment launches this June, helping educational teams deliver comprehensive value rather than just academic content. Click on the blue button in the image below to learn more . REFERENCES Bain & Company. (2016). The Elements of Value in Consumer Markets. Harvard Business Review. (2016). The Elements of Value, September 2016. National Student Engagement Survey. (2024). Post-Secondary Student Experience Report. Gallup-Purdue Index. (2024). Life and Career Outcomes for College Graduates. Youth Truth Survey. (2024). Student Voice on School Value and Engagement.
Show More