Higher Performance Insights | ENROLLMENT ≠ ENGAGEMENT: The Sobering Cost of Enrolling Students Then Losing Them

April 29, 2025
higher performance insights

33% of Your Revenue is Walking Out the Door


  • Revenue Impact: A 33% student attrition rate within three years represents millions in lost tuition revenue and potential alumni giving.
  • Competitive Advantage: Institutions prioritizing engagement over enrollment see 23% higher completion rates and improved rankings
  • Resource Efficiency: Retaining existing students costs 3- 5x less than recruiting new ones
  • Reputational ROI: Student engagement directly correlates with institutional reputation metrics and positive word-of-mouth


The Enrollment vs. Engagement Challenge


Campus executive teams across the country obsess over one metric above all others: enrollment numbers. They celebrate when headcounts rise and panic when they fall. But here's the fiscal reality that most leaders won't acknowledge: getting students in the door is not the real financial challenge in education today.


The actual crisis? Students are leaving at alarming rates, and institutional leaders would rather invest in another expensive CRM system than confront the uncomfortable truth about why. Each 1% improvement in retention translates to approximately $300,000 to $500,000 in preserved revenue for a mid-sized institution.


The Data Behind the Dropout Crisis


The numbers tell a devastating story that translates directly to institutional financial health:


  • According to the American Institutes for Research, on average, 23% of students don't return for their sophomore year, and an additional 10% leave before their junior year, resulting in a staggering 33% dropout rate over the first three years.
  • The U.S. News data reveals that "in many cases, 1 in 3 first-year students or more won't make it back for their second year" with reasons ranging "from family problems and loneliness to academic struggles and a lack of money."
  • Even at community colleges, which have seen improvements, retention rates hover around 55%, meaning nearly half of students drop out after their first year.


For institutional advancement professionals, this represents not just lost tuition but also diminished lifetime giving potential, as non-completers are 76% less likely to become donors.


The Uber Education: Real-World Impact on Institutional Reputation


Let me share something that happens with alarming regularity. In my work, I travel to dozens of campuses each week to serve their leaders and teams. During these travels, I spend considerable time in the back of Uber and Lyft rides. I've developed a habit of asking drivers if they know much about the campus I'm visiting.


Consistently—and disturbingly—drivers tell me they used to attend that very institution. When I ask why they left, about half cite straightforward economic reasons: "I couldn't afford it." But the other half? Their responses represent walking negative advertisements for your institution:


"I felt invisible there." "I was just a number." "The faculty didn't treat me with respect." "Nobody seemed to care if I showed up or not."


What's most telling? These former students are literally driving others to the very campuses they abandoned. In marketing terms, this represents thousands of negative brand impressions that no social media campaign can overcome.


The Structural Challenge: Institutional Inertia


Why do institutions continue pouring resources into enrollment while neglecting retention? The answer lies in structural challenges and institutional inertia that affect even the most well-intentioned campus leaders.


The enrollment-fixated culture persists because it aligns with traditional budget cycles and reporting structures. Enrollment creates immediate revenue and impressive statistics for board meetings. It doesn't require the cross-departmental coordination and long-term metrics that effective engagement strategies demand.


When retention initiatives require fundamental reassessment of how institutions operate—from teaching methods to student support systems—organizational inertia often redirects focus back to the familiar territory of enrollment metrics.


The emotional and financial investment in "round-the-clock caffeine-infused enrollment hustlers" represents a deeply ingrained institutional tradition that, while understandable, is increasingly at odds with financial sustainability in today's competitive landscape.


The Empathetic Reality Check for Campus Professionals


Let's acknowledge a brutal truth: the structural challenges that create this situation are deeply entrenched and not easily dismantled. Decades of institutional history, financial models, and academic traditions have developed systems that naturally resist transformation.


This isn't about assigning blame to campus leaders. Those I serve genuinely care about student success but find themselves constrained by systems that measure and reward the wrong things. The enrollment-obsessed culture didn't develop overnight, and it won't be overturned with a single initiative or program.


What's encouraging, however, is that professionals who successfully lead engagement transformations report accelerated career advancement and professional recognition, as their institutions outperform peers on key metrics that boards and accreditors increasingly prioritize.


A Practical 3-Step Path Forward: Proven Approaches for Immediate Implementation


90-Day Quick Start Timeline

  • Days 1-30: Audit existing engagement data sources and establish baseline metrics
  • Days 31-60: Implement pilot engagement initiatives in the highest-attrition departments
  • Days 61-90: Present initial findings to leadership with ROI projections


1. Establish Engagement as a Core Metric with Proven ROI


Real-world proof it works: Georgia State University transformed its retention rates by analyzing over 800 student data points to identify engagement risks early, helping more than 2,000 students stay on track annually. This initiative generated an additional $3 million in tuition revenue and significantly enhanced the institution's rankings.


5 Engagement KPIs That Predict Retention with 90% Accuracy:


  • Learning management system activity (frequency and duration)
  • Assignment completion rates
  • Faculty interaction frequency
  • Student service utilization
  • Co-curricular participation


When restaurant chains receive poor customer satisfaction scores, they often overhaul their menus and retrain their staff. When airlines receive low Net Promoter Scores, executives face increased scrutiny from the board. Yet when students express disengagement through course evaluations or by leaving, we rarely see comparable institutional accountability. Implementing these metrics has provided advancement opportunities for forward-thinking professionals across institutions.


2. Realign Resources and Rewards for Career Advancement


Real-world proof it works: Purdue University's "Back a Boiler" income share agreement program directly aligns institutional financial incentives with student success—the university only succeeds when graduates succeed. Meanwhile, Arizona State University ties executive compensation partly to student progression rates, and leaders who implemented these approaches have seen significant professional advancement.


The evidence shows that professionals who champion engagement-centered initiatives are 40% more likely to advance to senior leadership positions within five years, as these initiatives deliver measurable institutional improvements that boards recognize and reward.


Executives who have implemented retention-based compensation models report that these approaches not only improve student outcomes but also enhance departmental collaboration and innovation, key skills that accelerate professional development.


3. Create Institutional Accountability for Engagement Excellence


Real-world proof it works: Amarillo College restructured its leadership around a "No Excuses" poverty initiative, making student success the primary institutional accountability metric. This resulted in a tripling of graduation rates within five years. This initiative earned the college the prestigious Aspen Rising Star award, garnering national recognition for the leadership team. Valencia College's similar approach helped them win the Aspen Prize for Community College Excellence, significantly enhancing the professional profiles of key administrators.


Institutions that implement engagement accountability frameworks see an average 12% improvement in key performance indicators within two years, creating tangible success metrics for professionals who champion these approaches.


The Transformative Opportunity for Institutional Advancement


The institutions consistently gaining market share in today's competitive higher education landscape share one characteristic: they've shifted from an enrollment-fixated culture to one that values engagement equally, unlocking substantial revenue preservation and enhancement.


This isn't just about boosting retention rates; it's also about enhancing overall customer experience. It's about strengthening institutional financial sustainability while fulfilling the core mission of higher education: transforming students' lives through meaningful learning experiences.


The most successful campus professionals of the next decade will be those who recognize that engagement metrics aren't just nice-to-have supplements to enrollment data—they're essential predictors of institutional viability.


It's not just good educational practice—it's a sound business strategy for the increasingly competitive education industry.


Implementation Resources


5 Key Engagement Metrics to Start Tracking Tomorrow:



  1. Student-faculty interaction frequency
  2. Learning management system engagement
  3. Participation in high-impact practices
  4. Sense of belonging indicators
  5. Academic performance progression


What will you do differently next quarter?


References:

  • American Institutes for Research. (2023). The Overlooked Challenge of Second- to Third-Year Retention.
  • Assunção, H., et al. (2020). University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI): Transcultural validity evidence across four continents. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–12.
  • Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.
  • National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2024). Persistence and Retention.
  • U.S. News & World Report. (2025). University Rankings by First-Year Retention Rate.



Help Spread the Word

If you found value in this post, we’d love your help spreading the word! Please consider sharing this on your favorite social media platform and tag Higher Performance Group and Dr. Joe Hill. Your support helps us reach and inspire more awesome people like you!

Like What You've Read?


Get practical, research-based ideas to Accelerate Higher Team Performance delivered straight to your inbox every Tuesday.

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info June 11, 2025
How to Thread the Needle Between Progress and Funky Politics The longest bridge in the world spans 102 miles across the Danyang-Kunshan Grand Bridge in China. It wasn't built with one heroic leap—it was constructed one careful span at a time, each section tested and proven before the next began. As you sit in budget meetings with federal funding cuts looming and compliance investigations multiplying, that bridge isn't just an engineering marvel—it's your strategic blueprint for survival. Because in education today, yesterday's mainstream initiative can become tomorrow's federal investigation faster than you can say "equity audit." The Ground Is Moving Beneath Your Feet The new federal leadership has eliminated DEI initiatives, frozen federal grants, and directed the closure of the Department of Education. What was considered "acceptable" innovation six months ago may now be regarded as "radical." What seemed impossible is suddenly policy. Political scientist Joseph Overton identified how cultural acceptance shifts through what became known as the "Overton window"—the range of policies voters find acceptable at any given time. The Michigan-based Mackinac Center, where Overton worked, theorized that this window typically shifts gradually. However, we're witnessing something unprecedented: rapid, dramatic movements that compress decades of change into months. The current moment illustrates how quickly political boundaries can shift, transforming yesterday's fringe ideas into today's mainstream policies. Your strategic challenge isn't just adaptation—it's anticipation. Welcome to Educational VUCA Reality You're no longer managing regular strategic planning. You're navigating VUCA conditions—Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity—originally developed by the U.S. Army War College to describe post-Cold War strategic environments. Volatility: Federal funding freezes, Title IX reversals, and transgender sports bans hitting simultaneously across all educational levels. Uncertainty: Will Title I funding survive? Pell Grants dropping from $7,400 to $5,700? University endowments over $1 billion facing civil compliance investigations? Complexity: Special education funding shifting to block grants while maintaining "current levels," NIH grants paused, research costs capped at 15%. Ambiguity: Expand school choice while closing federal oversight. Promote "evidence-based" reading while eliminating professional development grants. Mixed messages aren't confusion—they're the new operating environment. Your Strategic Fill-in-the-Blank Framework Like Mad Libs, strategic prompts help you think creatively within structured boundaries. When political landscapes shift rapidly, ready frameworks keep you responsive rather than reactive (Senge & Edmondson, 2024): For K-12 Leaders: "What if we strengthened ______________ using only state and local resources before Title II funding disappears?" "How might we demonstrate student achievement gains without triggering federal investigations into our _______________ initiatives?" For Higher Ed Leaders: "What would happen if we reframed our diversity programming as ______________ student success initiatives?" "How do we maintain research momentum when ______________ federal funding streams face uncertainty?" These aren't prescriptions—they're thinking tools for navigating the "gotcha" landscape while maintaining your mission. The Professional Creative's New Reality Your job isn't to resist the tide, though values matter deeply. It's to be strategically creative—pushing just enough beyond the current window to serve students without triggering systems actively hunting for "radical" programs. The federal landscape reshapes rapidly, but your influence remains local. That's where your power lies—and increasingly, that power depends on your team's collective intelligence (Woolley et al., 2023). Navigating the Next 90 Days These are shifting landscapes with no clear roadmap. What follows aren't recommendations, but different lenses through which thoughtful leaders are viewing their challenges: What Some K-12 Leaders Are Exploring: Language emphasizing measurable outcomes—framing student support as academic acceleration Documentation highlighting concrete results rather than theoretical frameworks Strengthening local partnerships before federal resources become uncertain What Some Higher Ed Leaders Are Considering: Revenue diversification as traditional funding faces constraints Reexamining how student services are described and delivered Proactive compliance reviews, especially for institutions with significant endowments What Many Find Helpful: Building initiatives defensible through multiple political lenses—student achievement, family strengthening, and economic development. The key isn't perfect answers, but flexibility to adapt as circumstances evolve. This isn't about abandoning principles or playing politics. It's about finding sustainable ways to serve your mission when the ground keeps shifting. Your Strategic Courage Moment Leaders who successfully navigate these waters discover that careful, thoughtful approaches create space for others to find their own path forward. The opportunity lies not in perfect safety or bold risks, but in persistent creativity that builds bridges while the landscape around you changes. In environments like this, transformation comes less from brilliant strategy than from steady courage-the kind that spreads when others see it's possible to move forward thoughtfully, even in uncertainty. Research consistently demonstrates that team performance, not individual brilliance, determines institutional success in navigating turbulent waters (Deloitte, 2023). Your Next Steps: Audit your language. How would your current initiatives sound if described through achievement, family, or economic development lenses? Diversify your support. What local partnerships could replace federal dependencies? Document strategically. How do you measure impact in ways that translate across political perspectives? Build bridges, not monuments. Every program should be defensible as supporting student success—language that travels well in any political climate. The longest bridge in the world exists because engineers built it one tested span at a time. Your educational mission deserves the same careful and persistent attention. Your students need you to be strategically courageous—not reckless, not paralyzed, but thoughtfully bold enough to keep building bridges while the ground shifts beneath your feet. Because transformation doesn't require genius in this environment. It requires strategic courage—and the wisdom to know that sometimes the most radical act is building something that lasts. Unlock Your Team's Full Potential The cost of waiting is too high. Every day your team operates at less than full potential represents lost opportunities for your students and institution. Research indicates that most campus leadership teams operate at only 60% of their full potential (Higher Performance Group, 2024). Take the {TQ}|Team Intelligence Assessment In just five minutes per team member, discover actionable insights that have been demonstrated to improve team performance by an average of 27% within six months. The TQ Assessment reveals how your team can leverage cognitive diversity to transform from talented individuals into a truly intelligent collective. Your Next Steps: Assess Your Team's Intelligence : Take the comprehensive TQ assessment and receive your personalized team analysis within 48 hours Discover Your Path Forward : Schedule your complimentary TQ report review with a certified consultant Blueprint Your Success : Develop your practical 90-day plan to upgrade your team's performance 
By HPG Info June 4, 2025
Getting Your Value Proposition Right Matters More Than Getting Your Funnel Right The Problem? Your SEM and CRM Are Working Perfectly As enrollment declines accelerate and student engagement plummets, here's a hard truth: Our schools aren't failing — our values are. We're optimizing for yesterday's priorities while today's learners walk away hungry for something many are not even measuring. THE GREAT MISDIRECTION While we obsess over test scores and college readiness, Bain & Company groundbreaking research on the Elements of Value reveals why students, families, and communities are losing faith in our institutions. We're delivering functional value — but starving them of the emotional, life-changing, and social impact they desperately need. The numbers tell the story: 40% of high school students report chronic disengagement, college mental health crises have reached epidemic levels, and parents increasingly question whether education is worth the investment. Meanwhile, we continue to optimize metrics that don't measure what matters most. THE FOUR-LEVEL VALUE CRISIS Functional Level: We're Actually Decent Here - Schools save time (with organized schedules), provide information, reduce costs (compared to private tutoring), and offer a variety of courses. This is our comfort zone---and our trap. Emotional Level: We're Failing Spectacularly- When did schools stop being places that reduce anxiety and start being anxiety factories? Where's the fun, the therapeutic value, the wellness focus? Students (and staff) leave our institutions more stressed, not less. We've forgotten that learning should feel rewarding, not punishing. Life-Changing Level: We've Lost Our Way- Education should provide hope and enable self-actualization. Instead, we've created systems that crush dreams rather than cultivate them. How many students graduate feeling motivated about their future versus those who are relieved they survived? Social Impact Level: Our Biggest Miss - Schools should develop citizens who contribute to something larger than themselves. Instead, we're producing individuals who feel disconnected from their purpose and sense of community belonging. THE HIDDEN COST OF VALUE POVERTY Consider Sarah, a high school senior who recently told me: "I can pass any test you give me, but I have no idea who I am or what matters to me." Her school delivered functional value perfectly, and failed her completely. This isn't about lowering academic standards. It's about recognizing that when students feel emotionally depleted, disconnected from their purpose, and starved of a sense of belonging, even the most effective test prep becomes meaningless. Research shows that students experiencing higher-level value elements demonstrate: 67% better long-term retention 45% higher post-graduation satisfaction 78% stronger alumni engagement 52% better mental health outcomes THREE STRATEGIES TO RECLAIM VALUE Strategy 1: Design for Emotional Wellness First - Stop treating student mental health as an add-on service. Build therapeutic value into daily experiences: Start each class by connecting learning to students’ hopes and interests Create "anxiety reduction zones" where failure becomes learning fuel Design experiences that feel rewarding, not just rigorous Measure joy alongside achievement Strategy 2: Embed Life-Changing Moments - Every semester, students should experience at least three "this changes everything" moments: Connect learning to personal identity and purpose Create opportunities for genuine self-discovery Provide hope through mentorship and future visioning Enable students to see their unique potential actualized Strategy 3: Cultivate Social Impact Daily- Transform education from individual competition to collective contribution: Embed community service into academic learning Create opportunities for students to solve real community problems Build belonging through collaborative purpose Help students see their education as preparation for meaningful citizenship YOUR VALUE AUDIT CHALLENGE This Week: Survey 10 random students: "What value does school provide beyond academics?" Identify your school's emotional value gaps List three ways learning could feel more rewarding This Month: Redesign one program to include life-changing elements Create student wellness metrics that matter Pilot one community impact project per classroom This Year: Develop a comprehensive value proposition that addresses all four levels Train staff to recognize and deliver emotional and social value Measure student hope, belonging, and purpose alongside test scores POSSITIVE GOSSIP: THOSE GETTING IT RIGHT Higher Ed Spotlight: Arizona State University's "Be a Devil" Initiative - ASU transformed student experience by embedding social impact into every major. Their "solving world problems" approach delivers all four value levels simultaneously. Students report 89% satisfaction with purpose-driven learning, and employers actively recruit ASU graduates for their community-minded approach. The result? Record enrollment growth while peer institutions struggle. Learn more about ASU K-12 Spotlight: New Tech Network Schools - These project-based learning schools redesigned education around real community problems. Students at New Tech High in Napa don't just study environmental science---they solve actual water quality issues for local vineyards. The therapeutic value of meaningful work is evident in the following statistics: a 94% graduation rate, 87% college enrollment, and students who describe school as "the best part of my day." Their secret? Every project delivers hope, a sense of belonging, and self-actualization alongside academic rigor. Learn more about New Tech Network Both institutions demonstrate that when schools deliver comprehensive value, everything changes — engagement, outcomes, and community reputation. THE VALUE REVOLUTION MUST START NOW The schools thriving in 2025 aren't just academically excellent — they're emotionally nourishing, life-changing, and socially impactful. They understand that families don't choose schools solely based on test scores; instead, they choose based on the total value delivered. Your students aren't asking for less rigor — they're asking for more meaning. They don't want easier classes — they want classes that make them feel more alive, more hopeful, and more connected to something bigger than themselves. The Elements of Value framework isn't just business theory — it's a roadmap for educational transformation. When we deliver value at all four levels, we not only improve outcomes but also restore faith in education itself. Your value revolution starts with one simple question: If your students could get knowledge (and a degree) anywhere, why should they choose to learn with you? The answer isn't in your curriculum catalog — it's in how you make them feel about themselves, their future, and their place in the world. Ready to Lead This Discussion With Your Team? If you found value in this topic and would like an easy, prepared way to lead this discussion with your leadership team, we have included a leader guide in our weekly blog covering this same topic. Join our email group and receive timely topics like this with the added bonus of a downloadable team discussion guide. Go to https://www.higherperformancegroup.com/blog to sign up today! Our TQ | Team Intelligence Assessment launches this June, helping educational teams deliver comprehensive value rather than just academic content. Click on the blue button in the image below to learn more . REFERENCES Bain & Company. (2016). The Elements of Value in Consumer Markets. Harvard Business Review. (2016). The Elements of Value, September 2016. National Student Engagement Survey. (2024). Post-Secondary Student Experience Report. Gallup-Purdue Index. (2024). Life and Career Outcomes for College Graduates. Youth Truth Survey. (2024). Student Voice on School Value and Engagement.
Show More