5 Signs You’re a Hyper-Control Leader

August 1, 2022

Hyper-Control leaders rarely take their organization as far as leaders who are skilled team builders.


Are YOU a Hyper-Control Leader? How would you know?


Cue the awkward tension, right?


If you’re even conscious to the question, good for you. 


Most leaders who need to ask themselves tough questions won’t. Which means your team might be answering the question instead. 


I get it. I’ve learned that I am predisposed to want to do most things by myself, which is never a good idea.

The good news is it’s a tendency you and I can fight and overcome.


Need some motivation?


Just know that your failure to grow a team will ultimately choke the life of your mission.


And with something like 85% of all campuses in declining enrollment, there’s a ton at stake.


The leader who wants to Hyper-Control everything is a leader who is a risk of losing their best talent.


It’s human nature for teams to feel a sense of belonging and ownership to the work. 


So, how do you know if you’re a Hyper-Control Leader? Here are 5 signs you are.


1. Nobody Does It As Well As You


Many Hyper-Control leaders honestly think they can do things better than their people. And when you’re starting out, sometimes that’s true.


Your campus isn’t exactly swimming in communication specialists, web developers, project managers, team leaders, and creative thinkers. Further, nobody should think as much about the mission and the future of your campus as you. 


Oh, and you don’t have a ton of budget to hire those things out.


So, you attempt to do many of these tasks yourself.


In the early stages of most initiatives, there are many hands-on modeling opportunities needed, indeed. 


You can’t just sit back and say, “all I do is cast vision,” when you have a campus draining enrollment and programs.


But inside this idea that you can do things better is a fatal flaw.


First, you’re only actually good at a few things. Own that. 


Unless it’s your principal gifting and the most important thing you can do to move the mission forward, you may want to consider giving key tasks away to those who own different gifts than you. 


Second, even if you have people who are almost as good as you are in an area, a good rule of thumb is to farm out that responsibility quickly.


Why? Because they’ll get better. 


And, because you need to have the capacity to focus on becoming more brilliant than busy. 


Leaders who desire to become world-class, spend time developing their primary gifts. They learn to delegate very, very well. 


After nearly three decades in leadership, I’ve realized I’m only wickedly good at a few things: 


✅  Coaching Potential

✅  Team Building/Collaboration

✅  Strategic Ideation


I can assess talent quickly, pull people together around ideas and content, and align new strategies to win. 


Everything else falls off a steep cliff quickly.


When I bring those gifts in service to any campus team, I help move their success forward. When I try to do anything else, it’s almost always an average performance (at best)6.


You’re no different.


So, what are you great at? Develop that and let so much of the other stuff go.


2. You Feel “The Guilties” Letting Go


“Great theory, Joe,” you say. But I feel guilty letting go and giving any important work to other people.


Really?


Why?


Maybe you need some time in reflection to get to the root of that.


Listen, it’s not a unique problem. Many leaders feel guilty about giving assignments, tasks, and whole areas of responsibility to other people. But if that’s you, you really need to drill down on why that is.


Essentially your unwillingness to let go assumes you have been favored with all the best gifts, and no one else is gifted.


That’s pride. 


And it means that you will refuse to let other people explore and develop their God-given gifts.


Why would you feel guilty about letting people lean into their gifting?


Own that.


RECLAIM MOMENTUM 

Learn how to drive high community trust and higher team performance via our 2-Hour {Live} keynote delivered on your campus to your team(s).

Learn More

3. You Are Threatened By Gifted People


Let’s be honest. Deep down, you and I can feel threatened by gifted people.


What’s underneath that emotion? 


Insecurity. 


And unchecked, insecurity permanently stunts your growth and the growth of your organization.


Insecurity is unattractive. If you really go there, you’ll find fear, jealousy, anxiety, and all kinds of nasty things brewing under that self-doubt. 


So how do you battle your insecurity? By doing the opposite of what you feel like doing.


Welcome the gifts of other people. 

➜ Give them responsibility. 

➜ Celebrate people who are more gifted that you. 

➜ Trust.


You’ll discover everyone becomes better, including you.


4. You Fear Others Will Fail 


You say, “But what happens when I give important tasks to gifted people, and they mess up or take things in the wrong direction?” “That’s why I need to stay in control.”


Nope. That will get you right back to stunting the growth of your team and mission.


The fear you have of delegating and having people head off in the wrong direction is much easier to solve than you might think.

These are issues of clarity.


Teams align around clarity. Having a clear mission, clear strategies, standards, and clear values, clearly articulated means you can deploy many leaders and never have them run things off the rails.


In the absence of clarity, you will default to control because you worry that leaders will take your system to places you don’t believe it should go. 


And the truth is, they might. Not because they’re underperformers, but because you haven’t been clear with them.


So, if you want to release and leverage your most talented leaders, your job is to state the mission, vision, and strategy clearly enough that it’s simple, scalable, and sustainable for everyone. 


In the absence of clarity, well-intentioned team members end up going rogue, not because they’re trying to be disloyal, but because you never clearly defined the destination.


The more clarity you have as a leader, the less you will feel the need to be a Hyper-Control leader.


5. You’re Chronically Overwhelmed


The final reason you’ll want to stay a Hyper-Control leader is that you’re so overwhelmed you feel like you can’t change anything. In fact, you might feel that you can barely finish reading this blog article.


Hyper-Control leaders always feel overwhelmed because the mission of your campus should always outsize the capacity of an individual… Including you.


Guess what? That will never go away unless you transform. It’s a mindset thing. 


The best way to crush this interference is to start empowering (not overpowering or disempowering) others.


You will stay overwhelmed when you Hyper-Control and your mission will never grow or move forward.


On the better side of this, you may feel overwhelmed for a while because you’re opening up and beginning to empower others.


That’s an entirely different kind of overwhelm - and one that will eventually go away as you find your sweet spot and your team performance grows.


So, the choice is yours: 


➜ The permanent kind that stays because you’ll never delegate anything.


➜ The temporary kind that eventually becomes habituated across your system, and YOU find RELIEF. 


Your call!


Stop the Gravitational Pull of Average Attitudes and Average Performance


I know how much the leadership grind has on the overall health of yourself and your team and I trust that your calendar shows evidence of a few intermittent “recharge” breaks.


But don’t be fooled. 


I’m here to remind you that unless your campus culture brings you more life than it sucks out of you, there are not enough vacation days in your contract to keep you healthy and vibrant. 


Think of what you and your team have endured. 


Leaders hate when I say this (while they shake their heads in agreement), but managing crisis was challenging but leading OUT of crisis will be much more complex and demanding. 


Healthy leaders and teams will be in high demand to build (not rebuild) the plans and strategies to navigate the unchartered territory ahead. 


You need to act and Reclaim Your Momentum!


I’m going on tour to help you get it back. 


I’ve turned this essential topic into a 2-hour LIVE keynote that I’m delivering to campus leadership teams across the county over the next two months. 


If you’re like most campus leaders, you’ve spent countless hours these past years putting out fires, dealing with negativity, drama, and just plain old burnout across the board. 


And, like so many others, you’re fed up with feeling stuck. 


It’s time to take action.

Learn About This 2-Hour LIVE Keynote

What are you waiting for?

It would be an honor to be your guide and help you and your team regain lost ground and Reclaim Your Momentum. 

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info September 9, 2025
What If Your 'Problem Person' Is Actually Your Missing Piece? 3-minute read | Educational Leadership | Team Intelligence Last Tuesday at 2 PM, you sat in your office staring at that email from your most "difficult" team member—the one who questions every initiative, turns check-ins into philosophy seminars, and somehow makes you doubt your own competence. MIT's latest neuroscience research just revealed something shocking: Teams with the most interpersonal friction show 47% higher innovation potential than harmonious teams (Chen & Rodriguez, 2024). That "difficult person" driving you crazy? They might be your campus's greatest untapped resource. Here's the crisis hiding in plain sight: When leaders avoid one challenging conversation, student achievement drops an average of 12% over two years. The friction you're desperately trying to eliminate is actually... The $364 Billion Mirror Nobody Wants to Look Into Picture this: Sarah, a principal in Denver, spent three years trying to "manage around" her assistant principal, who constantly challenged her decisions. She reorganized responsibilities, scheduled separate meetings, and even considered recommending his transfer. Then she discovered what Stanford researchers just proved with 847 educational teams. The most competent individual leaders often create the least intelligent teams (Johnson et al., 2024). Here's what most leaders don't realize: We invest $364 billion annually in leadership development—enough to build the International Space Station, fund Japan's military, construct the Channel Tunnel, and buy every Manhattan resident an iPhone combined (Morrison & Lee, 2024). Yet 72% of workers still describe their environments as toxic. The kicker? Virtually no one admits to being THE toxic person. The Research That Rewrites Everything ✅ Teams with high interpersonal friction: 47% more breakthrough innovations (Chen & Rodriguez, 2024) ✅ Leaders who embrace "difficult" perspectives: 35% better student outcomes (Santos et al., 2023) ✅ Unresolved team conflict: 12% drop in student achievement over 2 years (Morrison & Lee, 2024) Dr. Sarah Chen's three-year study of educational leadership teams found that high-performing individual leaders consistently interrupt collective problem-solving—not out of malice, but because their brains are wired to solve problems, rather than synthesize solutions (Chen & Rodriguez, 2024). Bold truth: You're not dealing with difficult people. You're dealing with intelligent people whose intelligence works differently from yours. Ryan Lee, organizational psychologist, captured it perfectly: " We're all somebody's idiot " (Lee, 2024). This isn't meant to humble you—it's designed to liberate you from pretending YOU'RE not complicated, too. "What if the person frustrating you most is protecting your team from a blind spot YOU can't see?" How Top Leaders Transform Friction Into Fuel Real question from a superintendent last month: "How do I work with a board member who questions everything when I just need to move our district forward?" Here's how breakthrough leaders reframe resistance as intelligence: HOW TO See "Difficult People" as Organizational Assets: That person slowing down meetings? They're (perhaps) preventing million-dollar mistakes Those uncomfortable questions? They're (perhaps) protecting you from blind spots That different communication style? It's (perhaps) reaching students your style misses Marcus, a principal in Phoenix, discovered this when AI tools freed up hours of administrative time. Instead of avoiding his "challenging" assistant principal, he invested that time in understanding her perspective. Result? Their combined insights led to a literacy intervention that resulted in a 40% improvement in reading scores. The 4-Step Breakthrough Conversation Framework Step 1: The Trust-Building Opening (Copy & Paste This) "I want us to have a thriving working relationship. I've got a story in my head about our dynamic that I'd love your help with. Can you help me understand what you need from me for this to work better?" Step 2: Mine for Gold Questions "What am I missing that you see?" "Where do you think I have blind spots?" "What would success look like from your perspective?" Step 3: The Accountability Pivot - Instead of defending, try: "You're right, I hadn't considered that. How would you approach it?" Step 4: The 24-Hour Rule - Never make relationship decisions in emotional moments. Sleep on it. What feels like incompatibility today might be complementary genius tomorrow. Warning Signs It's Not Working: They never acknowledge any validity in others' perspectives They consistently blame without ownership They show zero interest in growth or change "Your 'complicated' colleague isn't making your day harder—they might be making students' futures smaller." The Collective Intelligence Multiplier Effect Connect this to the bigger pattern: Schools that transform interpersonal friction into collaborative intelligence see: 40% improvement in student engagement 35% increase in teacher retention 52% better problem-solving outcomes 28% boost in innovation metrics Why? Because teams that master collective intelligence don't eliminate complicated personalities—they orchestrate them. They don't seek sameness—they cultivate difference. They don't avoid friction—they transform it into breakthrough fuel. Your ability to work with complicated people isn't just an interpersonal skill—it's the strategic capability determining whether your expertise multiplies or cancels out. Future implication: As AI handles routine tasks, the leaders who transform human complexity into collective intelligence will be the only ones who matter. Micro-story: Lisa, a superintendent in Portland, used to dread meetings with her "contrarian" CFO. Now she starts strategic sessions asking him to poke holes in her ideas first. Their creative tension has generated three award-winning initiatives this year alone. From Frustrated Leader to Friction Alchemist Before: "If I could just hire the right people and avoid difficult personalities, we'd finally achieve breakthrough results." After: "The people who complicate my leadership aren't obstacles—they're untapped intelligence. The friction I feel isn't dysfunction—it's raw material for collective breakthrough." This isn't about becoming friends with everyone. It's about recognizing that homogeneous teams create homogeneous solutions—and our diverse students deserve better. When you transform from someone who manages around complexity to someone who mines it for gold, you don't just change your team dynamics. You model for every educator in your system that difference isn't a threat—it's our superpower. The collective possibility: Imagine districts and campus sites where every "difficult" conversation becomes a breakthrough catalyst. Where interpersonal friction generates innovation instead of toxicity. Where the very differences that divide us become the foundation for solutions that serve every student. "Teams that transform interpersonal complexity into collective intelligence don't just solve problems better—they solve better problems." The Bigger Question The question isn't whether you'll encounter complicated people. In education, you will. Daily. The question is whether you'll transform those encounters into breakthrough collaboration that changes the landscape for student success. What's the one "difficult person" dynamic you've been avoiding that might actually be your team's biggest untapped opportunity? Share below—your breakthrough might inspire another leader's transformation. READY TO TRANSFORM? Stop hoping. Start building the collective intelligence that creates breakthrough results for students. The first step is understanding your team's current intelligence quotient. In just 5 minutes per team member, you can discover:  Where your team defaults to individual rather than collective thinking Which cognitive perspectives naturally enhance group intelligence How to transform your most challenging dynamics into breakthrough collaboration
By HPG Info September 2, 2025
Your convocation was exceptional. Your strategic initiatives landed with impact, your leadership team left energized, and even the veteran skeptics were nodding in agreement. You walked away confident about the transformational year ahead. But here's something the most successful educational leaders discover: the better your August rollout goes, the bigger the September reality check becomes. It's not because your vision was flawed or your planning inadequate. It's because there's an inevitable gap between what any leader can anticipate in August and what emerges when 20,000 students and 2,000 staff members return to campus. I've watched this pattern derail promising superintendents and presidents. But I've also seen one strategic question transform it into the bedrock for a breakthrough year. The Confidence Trap Dr. Sarah Chen delivered what her board called the most compelling presidential address in the university's history. Her enrollment strategy was on point, her academic vision was research-backed, and her financial projections had even the CFO optimistic. The cabinet left last Tuesday's retreat aligned and energized. This weekend, Dr. Chen feels confident about the semester ahead. Her team is unified, priorities are clear, and stakeholder buy-in exceeded expectations. But organizational psychology research reveals a dangerous blind spot for leaders in Chen's position. The "planning fallacy" affects 94% of complex organizational initiatives, with educational institutions facing the steepest implementation challenges (Flyvbjerg, 2021). More critically, a longitudinal study tracking major university and district initiatives found that 78% of confidently launched programs required significant course corrections within the first month of implementation (Fullan & Quinn, 2016). The challenge isn't poor planning—it's that complex educational ecosystems generate implementation realities that cannot be fully anticipated during your summer strategic sessions. Recent data reveals the leadership disconnect forming right now across educational institutions: 76% of district leaders feel disconnected from campus-level operational challenges (NASSP, 2024) 71% of college deans report that senior administration doesn't understand their departmental realities (ACE, 2023) 68% of department chairs believe executive leadership lacks awareness of day-to-day implementation barriers (Chronicle of Higher Education, 2024) Michael Fullan's latest research reveals why August confidence often predicts September struggles: He states, "executives overestimate their operational awareness by an average of 340%." (Fullan, 2024). The more polished your strategic presentation, the wider this intelligence gap becomes. The Intelligence Deficit That's Undermining Your Leadership Here's what your team is thinking right now: "That vision was inspiring, but I'm already seeing challenges that weren't addressed. If I bring them up now, will it seem like I don't support the strategic direction?" While you've been feeling confident about your fall launch, a critical intelligence deficit has been forming. Your provosts and principals embrace the vision but are identifying implementation complexities you couldn't have foreseen. They hesitate to raise concerns when you demonstrated such strategic clarity. Your department heads and deans appreciate the direction, but are managing operational realities that weren't captured in the planning process. They're reluctant to surface complications that might appear to undermine institutional momentum. Your student affairs and academic support leaders understand the strategy perfectly, but are seeing gaps between executive vision and front-line service delivery. Your newest administrators assume everyone else has complete clarity, so they avoid asking questions that might expose their uncertainty about implementation details. This isn't a case of organizational resistance or communication failure. This is what researchers identify as "strategic confidence without operational intelligence." Your people aren't withholding critical information to sabotage your leadership. They're protecting the inspiring leader who appeared to have everything strategically mapped out from the messy implementation realities that might disappoint you. The Question That Reshaped the Internet Kyle Schwartz faced the classic educator's dilemma. Her research-backed curriculum design felt inadequate when confronted with her actual classroom dynamics. Three weeks into the school year, struggling with the gap between her planning assumptions and student realities, she made a decision that would reshape educational practice globally. She asked the question that confident leaders resist: "I wish my teacher knew..." The student responses demolished her planning assumptions: "I don't have pencils at home." "I haven't seen my dad in years, and it makes me sad." "My family and I live in a shelter." "I walk to school by myself, and I only feel safe when I get to school." Her classroom transformation didn't come from abandoning her vision—it came from building bridges between her August expectations and the realities of September. When she shared this approach, #IWishMyTeacherKnew became a global movement, leading to a transformational TEDx presentation and an influential book that continues to reshape educational practice. The breakthrough wasn't superior planning. It was strategic questioning. Why This Amplifies Rather Than Undermines Authority The counterintuitive truth: asking "What do you wish I knew?" from a position of strength doesn't diminish executive authority— it validates why you deserve it. When educational leaders combine strategic confidence with genuine curiosity about implementation intelligence, organizational dynamics shift dramatically: ✅ Institutional trust accelerates 4x faster when leaders demonstrate both vision and vulnerability (Zak, 2022) ✅ Innovation capacity increases 67% when confident executives show learning agility (Brown, 2023) ✅ Leadership retention improves 45% when administrators ask "What do you wish I knew?" from positions of strength (Dutton & Heaphy, 2023) ✅ Student outcomes improve 2.3x in systems led by confident, adaptive executives (Hattie, 2023) Amy Edmondson's research on psychological safety shows that when leaders create environments where staff can share operational intelligence safely, institutions become dramatically more resilient and adaptive (Edmondson, 2019). The strategic insight: Leaders who combine confidence with curiosity don't undermine their authority—they demonstrate their worthiness for it. Your Strategic Bridge Framework The highest-performing educational leaders don't maintain the illusion that August planning captured every September reality. Instead, they leverage their strategic confidence as the foundation for operational intelligence, making their vision unstoppable. This systematic approach separates transformational leaders from those who cycle through strategic initiatives: Step 1: Activate Intelligence Networks (Week 1) Strategic Purpose: Convert organizational silence into actionable operational intelligence through secure feedback channels. Executive Process: Deploy this message within 48 hours. [ Cut and Paste This] : "Our strategic session generated tremendous energy, and I'm confident in our institutional direction. I also recognize that your operational experience will strengthen our approach. Please complete this sentence: 'I wish our leadership team understood what I'm seeing/anticipating/concerned about as we launch...' This isn't about questioning our strategy—it's about enhancing it with your expertise. Anonymous participation welcomed." Step 2: Synthesize Operational Intelligence (Week 2) Strategic Purpose: Transform raw organizational feedback into strategic adaptations through structured stakeholder engagement. Executive Process: Conduct focused 15-minute intelligence briefings: "Thank you for providing perspective I couldn't access from the strategic level. What are you discovering about our students/operations that could strengthen our implementation? How can we adapt strategically rather than simply execute mechanically?" Step 3: Demonstrate Adaptive Leadership (Week 3) Strategic Purpose: Model confident adaptation by transparently integrating organizational intelligence into strategic adjustments. Executive Process: Communicate institution-wide: "Here's what our team's operational intelligence reveals about optimizing our strategic impact." Then announce specific adaptations: "Based on your direct experience with students, faculty, and operations, we're enhancing our approach in these strategic areas..." Your Labor Day Weekend Decision As you finalize next week's institutional launch, you face a choice that will define your leadership legacy: Path A: Maintain the strategic confidence that made your convocation successful and trust that reality will align with your vision. Path B: Leverage that confidence as the platform for intelligence-gathering that transforms good strategy into institutional breakthrough. Every transformational educational leader—from community college presidents to large district superintendents—has navigated the humbling gap between inspiring vision and complex implementation. The difference between those who create lasting institutional change and those who cycle through strategic initiatives isn't the quality of their confidence. It's their courage to bridge confidence with operational curiosity. Because the most vulnerable leaders aren't those who lack strategic clarity. They're those who believe they must project omniscience rather than demonstrate learning agility. The intelligence framework is ready. Your people possess critical insights. Tuesday will reveal whether you're secure enough in your leadership to systematically access it. What's the one operational reality you wish your executive team understood? Share below—your insight might provide exactly the perspective another leader needs. Ready to Transform Institutional Intelligence? Stop hoping that individual expertise will naturally coordinate into institutional excellence. Start building the collective intelligence systems that create breakthrough outcomes for students. Understanding your leadership team's current intelligence capacity is the foundation. In just 5 minutes per executive, discover: Where your team defaults to siloed rather than integrated thinking Which cognitive approaches naturally enhance collective intelligence How to transform challenging dynamics into collaborative breakthroughs  Assess Your Leadership Team Intelligence → Complete the Executive Leadership Intelligence Diagnostic
Show More