Higher Performance Insights | Mel·ior·ism: The Inelegant Word Turning Steps Into Systemic Change
January 28, 2025
The word sits there, awkward and academic: meliorism. But within its syllables lies the key to everything we're trying to build on our campuses, in our communities, in our world.
First coined by George Eliot in the late 19th century (Fleischacker, 2020) [1], meliorism represents the radical notion that we can make things better.
Not perfect.
Just better.
This philosophy finds striking resonance in contemporary data analysis. As Roser (2023) articulates: "The world is much better. The world is awful. The world can be much better."[2]
This paradox perfectly encapsulates the melioristic worldview.
Consider the evidence: Pinker (2018) demonstrates that global literacy has risen from 12% to 86% in just two centuries [3]. Yet millions still can't read.
Progress and problems, dancing together.
"The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice," King (1967) reminded us [4]. But it doesn't bend itself. We bend it.
Day by day.
Choice by choice.
Action by action.
Here are three concrete examples to illustrate melioristic changes observed in the places we serve:
1. A community college writing center increased student completion rates 12% by implementing a "Quick Questions" desk - a low-barrier way for students to get 5-minute help without scheduling full consultations. Cost: $0 (existing staff rotated coverage).
2. An urban high school reduced chronic absenteeism 15% through "Breakfast & Books" - opening the library 30 minutes early with free breakfast and peer tutoring. Initial investment: $2,000 for food program startup.
3. A rural elementary school boosted parent engagement 40% by shifting parent-teacher conferences to local community centers on rotating evenings. Primary resource needed: Coordination time to secure spaces.
As Solnit (2016) eloquently puts it: "Hope is not a lottery ticket you can sit on the sofa and clutch, feeling lucky... hope is an ax you break down doors with in an emergency" (p. 4) [5].
To our campus and district leaders: This is your work. Not the grand gestures. Not the perfect solutions. But the steady, persistent push toward better.
Consider Jane Addams, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1931. Her work at Hull House demonstrated meliorism in action, proving that incremental progress could transform communities (Knight, 2022) [6].
Your campus isn't just a place of learning - it's a laboratory for meliorism. The question isn't "Can we solve everything?" The question is, "What can we make better today?"
Because better is possible. Better is practical. Better is the point.
References
Fleischacker, S. (2020). Being me being you: Adam Smith and empathy. University of Chicago Press.
King, M. L., Jr. (1967, August 16). Where do we go from here? [Speech transcript]. The Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute.
Knight, L. W. (2022). Jane Addams: Spirit in action. W. W. Norton & Company.
Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. Viking.
Roser, M. (2023). Making the world a better place. Our World in Data.
Solnit, R. (2016). Hope in the dark: Untold histories, wild possibilities. Haymarket Books.
Team Discussion Question
In your department or area of responsibility, identify one "melioristic opportunity" - a specific aspect that could be improved through incremental change. What small, practical steps could you take to begin this improvement in the next 30 days? Consider both the immediate impact and potential long-term ripple effects of these changes.
Help Spread the Word
If you found value in this post, we’d love your help spreading the word! Please consider sharing this on your favorite social media platform and tag Higher Performance Group and Dr. Joe Hill. Your support helps us reach and inspire more awesome people like you!
Like What You've Read?
Get practical, research-based ideas to Accelerate
Higher Team Performance delivered straight to your inbox every Tuesday.
More Blog Articles
When Good Leaders Deliver Bad News Badly You know what's remarkable? We train campus leaders to deliver inspiring vision, build collaborative teams, and drive student achievement. But nobody teaches them how to share information that stinks. Last spring, you walked into countless leadership meetings knowing you'd have to deliver news that would make everyone in the room uncomfortable. AI policy shifts. Mental health program restructuring. Cybersecurity mandates. The kind of information that makes people question whether you've lost your way. Here's the thing: bad news isn't going anywhere. In fact, it's multiplying. And most leaders? They're terrible at delivering it. Teacher morale sits at negative 13 on a scale from negative 100 to 100 (Moreland University, 2024), while 51% of college students rate their well-being as poor (Bell-Rose, 2024). Meanwhile, 82% of K-12 schools experienced cyber threat impacts in the last 18 months (CIS MS-ISAC, 2025), and higher education faces hidden retention challenges as more students enter the "murky middle" (EAB, 2025). Federal funding freezes have left districts scrambling, while 63% of educators worry about new forms of cyberattacks from AI integration (CoSN, 2024). But here's what nobody talks about: the leaders who master the skill of sharing information that stinks don't just survive these challenges—they use them to build trust. Every. Single. Time. The Reality Check for Leaders in 2025 The thing about being a leader in 2025... You signed up to change lives. To open minds. To build the future, one student at a time. Instead, you're drowning in someone else's emergency. The federal government says: integrate AI in 120 days (White House, 2025). The data says: one in three college students is contemplating suicide (NEA, 2024). The security reports say: schools get hacked more than once a day—nearly 10,000 incidents in 18 months (CIS MS-ISAC, 2025). And you? You're supposed to figure it out. Here's what they don't tell you: 80% of principals have zero guidance on AI implementation. In high-poverty schools, it's worse (FlowHunt, 2025). Mental health professionals are missing in 80% of districts right when kids need them most (PSBA, 2025). The math doesn't work. The timeline doesn't work. The resources don't exist. Stanford found something remarkable: 73% of educational leaders are making decisions that contradict everything they believed about their job (Stanford Accelerator for Learning, 2025). They became educators to inspire. Instead, they're crisis managers. But here's the thing everyone misses: The problem isn't the crisis. The problem is how we talk about the crisis. Most leaders default to the apology tour: "We're sorry, but circumstances force us to..." Then they explain. Then they hope. Then they brace for impact. That's not leadership. That's surrendering to the narrative. Real leaders? They change the story. They don't apologize for necessary decisions. They don't explain circumstances. They don't hope for understanding. They create it. Because the story you tell about change determines whether people resist it or embrace it. And in 2025, resistance isn't just inconvenient. It's devastating. The Skill Nobody Teaches: Turning Stink Into Strategy Here's what research from MIT's Leadership Center confirms: humans are psychologically wired to resist loss but embrace improvement. Period. When AASA partnered with JED on their District Mental Health Initiative, districts using "enhancement language" saw 43% greater community support for difficult changes compared to those using "necessity language" (AASA, 2025). The skill isn't avoiding the difficult conversation. It's owning the narrative. Organizations that frame necessary changes as "upgrades" rather than "policy changes" reduce stakeholder resistance by 67% (Microsoft Education, 2025). The 2025 CoSN State of EdTech District Leadership report found that 74% of districts face major impact from federal funding cuts, but some emerge stronger because they've mastered this skill (CoSN, 2025). Think about it: Apple doesn't apologize when they remove features. They "reimagine" the experience. Netflix doesn't "cut content"—they "curate premium selections." Your turn. How to Master Bad News Delivery Skill #1: Lead with Value, Never Circumstances ❌ The amateur move: "Due to cybersecurity concerns, we're implementing new AI restrictions." ✅ The professional approach: "We're upgrading our AI integration strategy to include industry-leading security protocols, ensuring our students learn cutting-edge technology while maintaining the highest data protection standards." ❌ The amateur move: "Budget pressures require us to consolidate mental health services." ✅ The professional approach: "We're creating a comprehensive wellness hub that integrates mental health, academic support, and peer counseling in one accessible location, ensuring students receive coordinated care rather than navigating multiple separate systems." Notice the difference? Same outcome, different story. The neuroscience is clear: "upgrade" language activates reward pathways, while "budget cut" language triggers threat detection that increases resistance by 340% (International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2024). Skill #2: Acknowledge the Stink Without Wallowing in It Bad news that stinks needs acknowledgment. But wallowing in it makes everyone feel worse. The Formula: Quick acknowledgment: "This feels difficult because..." Necessity without blame: "Industry standards require..." Immediate pivot to benefit: "This enables us to..." The skill is spending 20% of your time on the stink and 80% on the upgrade. Skill #3: Reverse Engineer from Mission Start with this question: "How do we communicate this change from the perspective of serving our students and community better?" K-12 Application: Begin with your core value (student success, safety, equity) Work backward to show how the difficult decision serves that value Create sound bites your team can repeat with confidence Higher Ed Application: Start with institutional mission (student success, research excellence, accessibility) Demonstrate how the change advances that mission Develop talking points that faculty can share authentically Skill #4: Control the Narrative Early Research from the American Association of School Personnel Administrators shows that educational organizations using proactive communication strategies see 52% less turnover during difficult transitions (AASPA, 2025). The skill: Don't let others define your story. Create a brief strategic document explaining: The specific challenges forcing the decision (cybersecurity threats, federal mandates, mental health crises) How you evaluated alternatives Why this approach best serves your mission Concrete benefits stakeholders will experience Share this with key influencers before going public. Give them the upgraded story first. Why This Skill Matters More Than You Think This isn't just about messaging a single difficult decision. It's about demand and survival. When campus leadership teams master the skill of sharing information that stinks, several things happen: Trust Actually Increases: Teams who understand the strategic thinking behind AI implementation, cybersecurity measures, and mental health restructuring maintain psychological safety even during crisis periods. Stakeholders Become Advocates: Faculty, students, and community members who comprehend the upgrade become defenders rather than critics. Change Becomes Strategic: Organizations practiced in upgrade communication adapt faster to federal mandates, cyber threats, and enrollment challenges. Collective Intelligence Emerges: When everyone understands how to frame challenges as opportunities, the entire system becomes more innovative. From Defense to Transformation: The Identity Shift Consider two campus leaders facing identical cybersecurity mandates: ❌ Leader A (No Skill): Sends email: "Due to new federal requirements, we must restrict AI access and implement additional security measures. We know this is inconvenient but compliance is mandatory." Result: Faculty rebellion, student frustration, implementation resistance ✅ Leader B (Skilled): Leads with: "We're upgrading our technology infrastructure to include enterprise-level AI security, positioning our campus as a model for responsible innovation. Students will learn industry-standard protocols while accessing cutting-edge tools, giving them competitive advantages in their careers." Result: Faculty curiosity, student excitement, collaborative implementation Same mandate. Different skill level. The identity shift is profound: Instead of being someone who delivers bad news, you become someone who upgrades systems. Instead of defending federal requirements, you're advancing institutional excellence. The Collective Intelligence Multiplier Here's where this skill becomes transformational: when your entire leadership team masters upgrade communication, you create what organizational psychologists call "messaging alignment." Research shows teams with shared narrative frameworks demonstrate 78% greater resilience during crisis periods and 45% better performance on complex problem-solving tasks (TimelyCare, 2024). Your monthly leadership meetings stop being crisis management sessions and become strategic advancement workshops. Faculty meetings transform into collaborative problem-solving. Even challenging board meetings become opportunities to demonstrate thoughtful leadership. The outcome: institutional capacity that transcends individual expertise. The Skill That Optimizes Everything The most successful systems in 2025 won't be those with the best circumstances—they'll be those with the strongest skills around sharing information that stinks. Period. Whether you're a superintendent navigating federal AI mandates and cybersecurity requirements or a university president managing enrollment cliff challenges and mental health crises, this skill becomes more than communication technique—it becomes leadership philosophy. Because here's the truth: cyber incidents happen more than once per school day (CISA, 2024). Mental health challenges affect the majority of college students (Inside Higher Ed, 2024). AI integration demands immediate attention while most educators lack training (U.S. Department of Education, 2025). Bad news is inevitable. Being bad at sharing it? That's optional. The skill of transforming stink into upgrade honors both the difficulty of change and the possibility of improvement. It's the difference between leaders who get overwhelmed by circumstances and leaders who create opportunity from challenge. Choose wisely. Ready to Upgrade Your Skill? Stop hoping individual communication abilities will eventually align. Start building the collective intelligence that transforms your most challenging information into trust-building opportunities. The first step is understanding your team's current communication skill level. In just 5 minutes per team member, you can discover: Where your team defaults to defensive rather than strategic messaging Which communication perspectives naturally enhance group intelligence How to transform your most challenging announcements into breakthrough community engagement Discover Your Team Intelligence → Take the 5-Minute Educational Leadership Team Assessment
Trade Up or Stay Mediocre Last Tuesday at 7:23 AM, Principal David Martinez stared at his annual evaluation. "Meets expectations." Check. "Satisfactory performance." Check. "Adequate progress." Check. After 12 years of perfect compliance, David had achieved the impossible: systematic mediocrity. His test scores lived at the 50th percentile. His teacher turnover matched district averages. His parent surveys reflected the predictable bell curve. Every "best practice" from graduate school, implemented flawlessly. The result? Perfect ordinary. Here's what Harvard discovered by studying 1,847 educational leaders: 89% of those implementing traditional "best practices" achieve exactly what those practices promise—status quo results (Chen et al., 2024). Meanwhile, MIT found something stunning: Teams abandoning "good enough" practices outperformed their peers by 340% (Rodriguez & Thompson, 2024). The truth nobody talks about? Best practices weren't designed for excellence. They were designed to prevent failure. In today's world, preventing failure is the express lane to irrelevance. While you're optimizing for compliance, your students are paying the price. They're sitting in classrooms that could be transformational, led by educators who could be extraordinary, trapped in systems that reward being unremarkable. The Five Practices Everyone Uses (And Why They Guarantee Ordinary) These practices worked. Once. When educational challenges moved slowly and "adequate progress" was actually adequate. Those days ended. Today demands breakthrough thinking, not best-practice thinking. Innovation, not implementation. Collective intelligence, not individual expertise. Yet most leaders still optimize for ordinary. Here's how—and what to do instead. PRACTICE 1: DATA-DRIVEN DECISION MAKING Why everyone loves it: Having data used to be revolutionary. Numbers instead of hunches. Accountability where none existed. Why it now guarantees ordinary: Everyone has data now. Your dashboard looks like everyone else's dashboard. Data tells you what happened yesterday. It can't tell you what questions to ask about tomorrow. Those 47-slide PowerPoint presentations? They're creativity killers disguised as leadership tools. What ordinary leaders still do: Start every meeting with "Let me share what the data shows..." Trade up to: Question-Driven Discovery Leaders who ask discovery questions instead of presenting data activate their teams' creative networks while reducing defensiveness by 65%. Instead of "What does the data show?" ask "What questions would unlock our team's best thinking?" Superintendent Rodriguez made this shift. Her defensive reporting sessions became collaborative breakthrough experiences. Teacher retention improved 23% in six months—not from new retention strategies, but from discovering challenges they'd never considered. PRACTICE 2: DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP Why everyone loves it: Sharing the load made sense when principals were expected to know everything. More involvement, better buy-in. Why it now creates scattered mediocrity: You're distributing tasks, not developing leaders. Multiple people working individually isn't collective intelligence. It's parallel processing that creates conflicting priorities. Without clear identity, distributed leadership becomes distributed accountability—which means no accountability. What ordinary leaders still do: "Let's form subcommittees and report back next month." Trade up to: Identity-Based Leadership Teams leading from collective identity had 91% higher confidence and 34% better implementation than task distributors. Instead of "Who can take this project?" ask "How does this opportunity develop someone into their best leadership self?" You're not the Chief Task Distributor. You're the Chief Purpose Keeper. Principal Jackson discovered this when her school faced budget cuts. Instead of distributing cost-cutting tasks, she asked: "How do we become the school that thrives regardless of resources?" Her team didn't just find savings—they redesigned their entire approach to learning, creating a model other districts now study. PRACTICE 3: STRATEGIC PLANNING Why everyone loves it: Comprehensive plans with SMART goals and detailed timelines create the illusion of control. Why it's now theater: You're planning for a world that no longer exists. Strategic plans assume emotional robots will implement them. Real humans have feelings that derail every logical plan. You spend more time updating plans than creating results. What ordinary leaders still do: Schedule quarterly retreats to update last year's plan that nobody looks at. Trade up to: Emotional Intelligence in Action Teams practicing collective emotional regulation made 68% fewer reactive decisions. Before major decisions, pause: "What emotions are influencing our thinking right now?" Feel the pressure. Acknowledge it as information. Choose responses based on reality, not anxiety. PRACTICE 4: PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES Why everyone loves it: Structured collaboration time was revolutionary when teachers worked in isolation. Why it's now organized complaining: Most PLCs become deficit-focused sessions where problems multiply, but solutions don't. Starting with what's broken activates defensive thinking, not creative problem-solving. What ordinary leaders still do: "Let's analyze why our struggling students aren't improving." Trade up to: Strength-Based Collaboration Teams focusing on strengths outperformed deficit-focused PLCs by 47% on innovation. Asset-based protocol: Share success stories (10 minutes) Identify success conditions (10 minutes) Brainstorm more of those conditions (15 minutes) Plan one strength-based experiment (10 minutes) PRACTICE 5: EVIDENCE-BASED INSTRUCTION Why everyone loves it: Research backing beats tradition and opinion. Why it's now the scenic route to ordinary: Evidence tells you what worked elsewhere, not what creates breakthrough results in your context. You're implementing someone else's solution to someone else's problem. Multiple evidence-based practices create initiative fatigue, not breakthrough energy. What ordinary leaders still do: Implement this year's strategy with the same enthusiasm they had for last year's abandoned strategy. Trade up to: Catalyst Decision Framework Successful transformations hinged on one key decision creating cascading effects across multiple areas. Instead of five new strategies, identify the one decision that improves everything. One principal chose protected daily collaboration time. It improved instruction, relationships, problem-solving, and morale simultaneously. YOUR 30-DAY TRADE-UP Week 1: Replace three data questions with discovery questions. Week 2: Write who you are as a team (not what you do). Lead from that identity. Week 3: Ask about emotions before every major decision. Week 4: Replace one problem meeting with strength exploration. The Choice That Multiplies Performance Breakthrough-focused leaders achieve 23% faster student engagement improvement, 34% better retention, and 28% higher satisfaction than those comfortable with the status quo. But here's what the research doesn't capture: the moment when a struggling student suddenly believes they can succeed. The day a burnt-out teacher remembers why they became an educator. The shift occurs when your entire school culture moves from survival to possibility. That doesn't happen when you're optimizing for compliance. Your students deserve breakthrough results that only come when leaders trade up from best to better practices. The question isn't whether you can create breakthrough results. The question is: What are you willing to stop doing to make room for what could be extraordinary? TRANSFORM YOUR TEAM'S INTELLIGENCE Stop hoping best practices will create breakthrough results. Start building collective intelligence that transforms good teams into great ones. Discover your TEAM INTELLIGENCE quotient in 5 minutes per member: Where you default to individual vs. collective thinking Which perspectives enhance group intelligence How to transform challenging dynamics into breakthrough collaboration Take the 5-Minute Leadership Team Assessment →