Higher Performance Insights | ARE YOU CALLED OR CONFUSED?

June 24, 2025
higher performance insights

Why 70% of Campus Leaders Are Burning Out—and How to Join the 30% Who Aren't


Are you well placed?


Here's what the latest research won't tell you:


Turnover rates for top leadership positions in higher education have reached an unprecedented high of over 20% between 2022 and 2024. But here's the part that should keep you awake at night—most of these departures aren't about budget cuts or external pressures.


They're about leaders who never found their sweet spot.


The difference between leaders who thrive and those who burn out comes down to one question: Where do your abilities, your affinities, and your opportunities intersect?


Remove any leg from this three-legged stool, and the whole thing topples. Get all three aligned, and you've discovered what researchers call your "calling"—which correlates with "feelings of satisfaction, efficacy, and meaningfulness" and can even "improve career performance."


The Campus Leadership Crisis Nobody's Talking About


Walk through any university today, and you'll see the symptom everywhere: smart, capable leaders spinning their wheels. They're managing budgets, faculty relations, student experience, accreditation, fundraising, and community partnerships. Always moving, always busy.


But busy doesn't equal effective.


Harvard's 2024 Global Leadership Development Study found that 70% of leaders say it's important to "master a wider range of effective leadership behaviors." Still, the real challenge isn't learning more skills—it's knowing when and how to deploy them.


The leaders who actually transform institutions have learned something counterintuitive. In an age of infinite demands, the most powerful strategy is focus, not addition.


They've built their leadership around three non-negotiable pillars.


Pillar One: Your Abilities (What You're Actually Good At)


This isn't about your job description or what you wish you were good at. Research on leadership effectiveness in higher education identifies "13 forms of leader behavior that are associated with departmental effectiveness"—but here's the kicker: no single leader excels at all thirteen.


Your abilities might include:


  • Reading complex organizational dynamics
  • Building bridges between competing factions
  • Translating academic vision into practical action
  • Connecting authentically with students
  • Navigating political complexities
  • Turning around struggling departments


The ability test is simple: What do colleagues consistently ask for your help with? What work feels effortless to you but seems difficult for others?


Recent research highlights "the essential attributes of effective higher education leadership, including personal, interpersonal, teaching, and academic capacities," but self-awareness isn't optional here. It requires honest assessment and feedback from people who've watched you lead.


Pillar Two: Your Affinities (What Energizes You)


Affinity goes deeper than interest. Researchers define this as what you "find meaningful beyond financial rewards" and note that individuals who identify this report "higher job satisfaction, higher job performance, less job stress, and longer tenure."


It's what you naturally gravitate toward even when no one's paying you to do it. The problems you think about in the shower. The work that doesn't feel like work.


In campus leadership, this might be:


  • Helping first-generation students navigate college
  • Building innovative academic programs
  • Solving complex resource allocation puzzles
  • Mentoring emerging faculty
  • Creating campus-community partnerships
  • Advancing research that matters


Affinity is your sustainability engine. But research also warns of the "dark side" of pursuing a calling—when people experience "regret, stress, or disappointment when they recognize a calling but it goes unfulfilled."


Without genuine affinity, you'll burn out. With it, you'll find energy even in the hardest seasons.


Pillar Three: Your Opportunities (Where the World Needs You)


This is the reality check that prevents noble dreams from becoming expensive failures.


Opportunity requires understanding your specific context: What does your institution need? Your community? Your students? Educational institutions face "dramatic systemic change" requiring "radical responses" from leaders who must balance "organizational functions that call for stability with those that demand creativity and adaptation."


Right now, our educational landscape faces unprecedented challenges:


  • Declining enrollment and funding pressures
  • Questions about ROI and career relevance
  • Technology disruption and digital transformation needs
  • Mental health crises among students
  • Workforce preparation for rapidly changing economies


The opportunity question is: Where do these real needs intersect with your unique context and capabilities?


The Research-Backed Sweet Spot Effect


When all three pillars align, something remarkable happens that the data supports:


Clarity emerges. Research shows that "career calling" serves as "a positive resource promoting vocational development and well-being."


Energy increases. Leaders who experience their careers as a vocation demonstrate increased "courage," which "plays a mediating role between career calling and well-being indicators."


Impact compounds. Studies reveal "a significant relationship between leadership styles in education institutions and academic staff's job satisfaction," with transformational leadership showing the strongest correlations.


Others rally. Research on teaching and learning leadership reveals that effective leaders prioritize "communication within and between communities of scholars and on working together, with the aim of achieving goals."


This isn't about finding the perfect job title. As research on calling demonstrates, it's about distinguishing between a general or primary calling and a relationship with the soul’s inner need for worthy work, loving community, and reclaimed suffering within a particular vocational path.


Your Assignment (Backed by Science)


Before your next leadership meeting, grab three sheets of paper:


Sheet 1 - Abilities: List 5-7 things you're genuinely good at in your leadership role. Research suggests asking trusted colleagues what they see as your strengths, as "surprisingly little systematic research has been conducted on which forms of leadership are associated with departmental effectiveness."


Sheet 2 - Affinities: Write down what aspects of your leadership energize you most. Research shows that "purpose can be an important component in the career decision-making process," and individuals who find their work meaningful report better outcomes.


Sheet 3 - Opportunities: Identify the 3-5 biggest needs your institution faces where leadership could make a real difference. Studies show that the most significant challenges center around "strategic leadership, flexibility, creativity, and change-capability" as well as "responding to competing tensions."


Now look for overlap. Where do all three intersect?


That intersection might be your calling as a campus leader.


The Three-Pillar Truth


With leadership turnover at unprecedented highs and "intense pressures and challenges leaders face in the sector," your institution doesn't need you to be good at everything. It requires you to excel at something that matters, something that energizes you, something the world actually needs.


Build your leadership on those three pillars.


Everything else is just noise.


YOUR TURN: Team Discussion Questions


Want to transform individual insight into institutional change? Use these questions with your leadership team:


Round 1 - Individual Reflection (10 minutes) Each team member privately identifies their top 2-3 items in each circle:


  • What leadership abilities do you bring that others consistently seek out?
  • What aspects of campus leadership genuinely energize you?
  • What institutional challenges could your leadership meaningfully address?


Round 2 - Team Mapping (15 minutes) Create a shared whiteboard with three columns. Have each person share one item from each circle. Look for:


  • Ability Gaps: Where are we missing crucial leadership strengths?
  • Passion Overlap: What energizes multiple team members?
  • Opportunity Blind Spots: What institutional needs aren't we addressing?


Round 3 - Strategic Alignment (10 minutes) Identify the sweet spots where individual team members' three circles align with institutional priorities. Ask:


  • Whose abilities should we be leveraging more strategically?
  • Are we deploying people in roles that match their affinities?
  • What opportunities require us to restructure leadership responsibilities?


The goal isn't perfection—it's clarity about how to deploy your leadership capital most effectively.



Register for the assessment https://www.higherperformancegroup.com/team-intelligence-assessment


References:


  1. Deloitte Insights. (2025). 2025 Higher Education Trends. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/2025-us-higher-education-trends.html
  2. Harvard Business Publishing. (2024). 2024 Global Leadership Development Study. Retrieved from https://www.harvardbusiness.org/leadership-learning-insights/2024-global-leadership-development-study/
  3. Bryman, A. (2007). Effective leadership in higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 693-710.
  4. Aswad, N.G., et al. (2024). A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of trends in higher education leadership in the Global South, 2013-2023. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102421.
  5. Dik, B.J., & Duffy, R.D. (2009). Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(3), 424-450.
  6. Parola, A., Zammitti, A., & Marcionetti, J. (2023). Career calling, courage, flourishing and satisfaction with life in Italian university students. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 345.
  7. Aziri, B., et al. (2023). The relation between leadership styles in higher education institutions and academic staff's job satisfaction: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1142411.
  8. Kinnunen, P., et al. (2024). Bringing clarity to the leadership of teaching and learning in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(1), 265-280.


Where do your abilities, affinities, and opportunities intersect in your campus leadership role? Share your insights in the comments—let's learn from each other's clarity.



Help Spread the Word

If you found value in this post, we’d love your help spreading the word! Please consider sharing this on your favorite social media platform and tag Higher Performance Group and Dr. Joe Hill. Your support helps us reach and inspire more awesome people like you!

Like What You've Read?


Get practical, research-based ideas to Accelerate Higher Team Performance delivered straight to your inbox every Tuesday.

More Blog Articles

By HPG Info June 17, 2025
Here's how campus leaders break the cycle Here's what nobody tells you about climbing the education ladder: Every rung makes learning feel more optional. Every promotion whispers that you've arrived. Every title suggests you should know, not grow. It's a trap. The thing about Maslow Most campus leaders know the hierarchy. Self-actualization sits at the top like a trophy. Except Maslow didn't stop there. Right before he died, he added level eight: self-transcendence. The recognition that your growth isn't about you—it's about enabling everyone else's growth. He knew something most campus leaders miss: The moment you stop learning, you start the slow leak of influence. THE NUMBERS DON'T LIE When campus leaders position themselves as chief learners instead of chief knowers: Faculty retention jumps 23%. Student outcomes improve 17%. Organizational resilience increases 35%. When they don't? Institutional influence drops 30% within three years. Your campus culture doesn't mirror what you say about learning. It mirrors what you do about learning. THE QUESTION THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING When was the last time your team saw you struggle with something new? Not struggle with budget constraints, board politics, or enrollment challenges. Those are management struggles—predictable, expected, part of the job description. When did they last see you wrestle with an idea? When did they witness your intellectual vulnerability? Here's the thing: Harvard's 2024 research shows that 70% of organizations believe leaders need to master a broader range of behaviors to meet current needs. In education's volatile landscape, intellectual rigidity isn't just limiting—it's dangerous. WHAT SELF-TRANSCENDENT LEADERS DO They get comfortable being uncomfortable. They attend lectures outside their expertise. They ask questions that reveal curiosity, not evaluation. They share their learning failures in real time. They understand that in a world where yesterday's best practices become tomorrow's compliance violations, learning agility is no longer a nice-to-have. It's survival. They know their learning gives them more influence than their title ever will. YOUR 90-DAY CHALLENGE What if—for the next 90 days—every campus leader publicly committed to learning something entirely outside their expertise? What if intellectual vulnerability at the top became permission for everyone else to adapt, grow, innovate? What if your next leadership meeting started with: "Here's what I learned this week that surprised me..." THE BRIDGE BUILDERS The longest bridge in the world spans 102 miles. It wasn't built with one heroic leap—it was constructed one careful span at a time. Campus leaders who thrive in uncertainty don't rely on a brilliant strategy; instead, they rely on a resilient mindset. They build learning habits. They model intellectual curiosity. They create cultures where growth is expected, not exceptional. They know that when the ground keeps shifting underneath everything else, the one constant is the need to keep learning how to build the next span. THE CHOICE You can be the campus leader who knows everything. Or you can be the one who learns everything. Only one of those creates the culture your students deserve. Only one of those builds bridges while the landscape changes. Only one of those recognizes that the most radical act in education today might just be admitting you don't know—and then doing something about it. What's something you learned recently that surprised you? Share it. Show your campus what learning leadership looks like. P.S. Most campus leadership teams operate at 60% of their potential. The {TQ}|Team Intelligence Assessment shows you how to unlock the other 40%. Five minutes per team member. Measurable results within six months. Because your campus deserves more than a collection of smart people, it deserves actual intelligence.
By HPG Info June 11, 2025
How to Thread the Needle Between Progress and Funky Politics The longest bridge in the world spans 102 miles across the Danyang-Kunshan Grand Bridge in China. It wasn't built with one heroic leap—it was constructed one careful span at a time, each section tested and proven before the next began. As you sit in budget meetings with federal funding cuts looming and compliance investigations multiplying, that bridge isn't just an engineering marvel—it's your strategic blueprint for survival. Because in education today, yesterday's mainstream initiative can become tomorrow's federal investigation faster than you can say "equity audit." The Ground Is Moving Beneath Your Feet The new federal leadership has eliminated DEI initiatives, frozen federal grants, and directed the closure of the Department of Education. What was considered "acceptable" innovation six months ago may now be regarded as "radical." What seemed impossible is suddenly policy. Political scientist Joseph Overton identified how cultural acceptance shifts through what became known as the "Overton window"—the range of policies voters find acceptable at any given time. The Michigan-based Mackinac Center, where Overton worked, theorized that this window typically shifts gradually. However, we're witnessing something unprecedented: rapid, dramatic movements that compress decades of change into months. The current moment illustrates how quickly political boundaries can shift, transforming yesterday's fringe ideas into today's mainstream policies. Your strategic challenge isn't just adaptation—it's anticipation. Welcome to Educational VUCA Reality You're no longer managing regular strategic planning. You're navigating VUCA conditions—Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity—originally developed by the U.S. Army War College to describe post-Cold War strategic environments. Volatility: Federal funding freezes, Title IX reversals, and transgender sports bans hitting simultaneously across all educational levels. Uncertainty: Will Title I funding survive? Pell Grants dropping from $7,400 to $5,700? University endowments over $1 billion facing civil compliance investigations? Complexity: Special education funding shifting to block grants while maintaining "current levels," NIH grants paused, research costs capped at 15%. Ambiguity: Expand school choice while closing federal oversight. Promote "evidence-based" reading while eliminating professional development grants. Mixed messages aren't confusion—they're the new operating environment. Your Strategic Fill-in-the-Blank Framework Like Mad Libs, strategic prompts help you think creatively within structured boundaries. When political landscapes shift rapidly, ready frameworks keep you responsive rather than reactive (Senge & Edmondson, 2024): For K-12 Leaders: "What if we strengthened ______________ using only state and local resources before Title II funding disappears?" "How might we demonstrate student achievement gains without triggering federal investigations into our _______________ initiatives?" For Higher Ed Leaders: "What would happen if we reframed our diversity programming as ______________ student success initiatives?" "How do we maintain research momentum when ______________ federal funding streams face uncertainty?" These aren't prescriptions—they're thinking tools for navigating the "gotcha" landscape while maintaining your mission. The Professional Creative's New Reality Your job isn't to resist the tide, though values matter deeply. It's to be strategically creative—pushing just enough beyond the current window to serve students without triggering systems actively hunting for "radical" programs. The federal landscape reshapes rapidly, but your influence remains local. That's where your power lies—and increasingly, that power depends on your team's collective intelligence (Woolley et al., 2023). Navigating the Next 90 Days These are shifting landscapes with no clear roadmap. What follows aren't recommendations, but different lenses through which thoughtful leaders are viewing their challenges: What Some K-12 Leaders Are Exploring: Language emphasizing measurable outcomes—framing student support as academic acceleration Documentation highlighting concrete results rather than theoretical frameworks Strengthening local partnerships before federal resources become uncertain What Some Higher Ed Leaders Are Considering: Revenue diversification as traditional funding faces constraints Reexamining how student services are described and delivered Proactive compliance reviews, especially for institutions with significant endowments What Many Find Helpful: Building initiatives defensible through multiple political lenses—student achievement, family strengthening, and economic development. The key isn't perfect answers, but flexibility to adapt as circumstances evolve. This isn't about abandoning principles or playing politics. It's about finding sustainable ways to serve your mission when the ground keeps shifting. Your Strategic Courage Moment Leaders who successfully navigate these waters discover that careful, thoughtful approaches create space for others to find their own path forward. The opportunity lies not in perfect safety or bold risks, but in persistent creativity that builds bridges while the landscape around you changes. In environments like this, transformation comes less from brilliant strategy than from steady courage-the kind that spreads when others see it's possible to move forward thoughtfully, even in uncertainty. Research consistently demonstrates that team performance, not individual brilliance, determines institutional success in navigating turbulent waters (Deloitte, 2023). Your Next Steps: Audit your language. How would your current initiatives sound if described through achievement, family, or economic development lenses? Diversify your support. What local partnerships could replace federal dependencies? Document strategically. How do you measure impact in ways that translate across political perspectives? Build bridges, not monuments. Every program should be defensible as supporting student success—language that travels well in any political climate. The longest bridge in the world exists because engineers built it one tested span at a time. Your educational mission deserves the same careful and persistent attention. Your students need you to be strategically courageous—not reckless, not paralyzed, but thoughtfully bold enough to keep building bridges while the ground shifts beneath your feet. Because transformation doesn't require genius in this environment. It requires strategic courage—and the wisdom to know that sometimes the most radical act is building something that lasts. Unlock Your Team's Full Potential The cost of waiting is too high. Every day your team operates at less than full potential represents lost opportunities for your students and institution. Research indicates that most campus leadership teams operate at only 60% of their full potential (Higher Performance Group, 2024). Take the {TQ}|Team Intelligence Assessment In just five minutes per team member, discover actionable insights that have been demonstrated to improve team performance by an average of 27% within six months. The TQ Assessment reveals how your team can leverage cognitive diversity to transform from talented individuals into a truly intelligent collective. Your Next Steps: Assess Your Team's Intelligence : Take the comprehensive TQ assessment and receive your personalized team analysis within 48 hours Discover Your Path Forward : Schedule your complimentary TQ report review with a certified consultant Blueprint Your Success : Develop your practical 90-day plan to upgrade your team's performance 
Show More